Assessing Topographic Structural Connectivity of the Human Basal Ganglia and Thalamus
Gilani, I. A.; Oguz, K. K.; Boyaci, H.; Doerschner, K.
Show abstract
The basal ganglia and thalamus play an important role in cognition, procedural learning, eye movements, control of voluntary motor movements, emotional control, habit development, and are structures that are severely impacted by neurological disorders such as Parkinsons disease, or Tourette syndrome. To understand the structural connectivity of cortical and subcortical circuits in the healthy human brain could thus be of pivotal importance for detecting changes in this circuitry and to start early intervention, to assess the progress of movement rehabilitation, or the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches in neuropsychiatry. While conventional clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is able to provide detailed information about connectivity at the macro level, the sensitivity and specificity of such structural imaging methods put limits on the amount of detail one can obtain when measuring in vivo connectivity of human basal ganglia and thalamus at routine clinical magnetic field strengths. In contrast, the multiband diffusion echo planar imaging method, which acquires multiple slices simultaneously, enables high resolution imaging of these abovementioned brain structures with only short acquisition times at 3-Tesla and higher magnetic field strengths. To unleash the greater potential of information embedded in data acquired with this technique, complementary data processing pipelines are required. Here, we use a protocol composed of multiband diffusion-, T1- and susceptibility weighted data acquisition sequences and introduce an associated pipeline based on combined manual and automated processing. The design of this data processing pipeline allows us to generate comprehensive in vivo participant-specific probabilistic patterns and visualizations of the structural connections that exist within basal ganglia and thalamic nuclei. Moreover, we are able to map specific parcellations of these nuclei into sub-territories based on their connectivity with primary motor-, and somatosensory cortex. This data processing strategy enables detailed subcortical structural connectivity mapping which could benefit early intervention and therapy methods for human movement rehabilitation and for treating neuropsychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional connectome of brainstem nuclei involved in autonomic, limbic, pain and sensory processing in living humans from 7 Tesla resting state fMRI 97%
- Functional connectome of arousal and motor brainstem nuclei in living humans by 7 Tesla resting-state fMRI 97%
- Shape Analysis of the Human Association Pathways 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic atlas of the lateral parabrachial nucleus, medial parabrachial nucleus, vestibular nuclei complex and medullary viscero-sensory-motor nuclei complex in living humans from 7 Tesla MRI 96%
- Functional connectivity of thalamic nuclei during sensorimotor task-based fMRI at 9.4 Tesla 96%
- Tackling the challenges of group network inference from intracranial EEG data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Subcortical Atlas of the Marmoset (SAM) monkey based on high-resolution MRI and histology 94%
- Connectivity Gradient in the Human Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus: Intraoperative Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potential Study 94%
- Simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping of sensory activation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- 3 versus 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures 95%
- Assessing white matter plasticity in a randomized controlled trial of early literacy training in preschoolers 94%
- Multimodal principal component analysis to identify major features of white matter structure and links to reading 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.