The effect of depth context in the segmentation of the colon in MRI volumes
Benson, E.; Rier, L.; Millican, I.; Pritchard, S. E.; Costigan, C.; Pound, M. P.; Major, G.; French, A. P.; Gowland, P. A.; Pridmore, T. P.; Hoad, C. L.
Show abstract
Colonic volume content measurements can provide important information about the digestive tract physiology. Development of automated analyses will accelerate the translation of these measurements into clinical practice. In this paper, we test the effect of data dimension on the success of deep learning approaches to segment colons from MRI data. Deep learning network models were developed which used either 2D slices, complete 3D volumes and 2.5D partial volumes. These represent variations in the trade-off between the size and complexity of a network and its training regime, and the limitation of only being able to use a small section of the data at a time: full 3D networks, for example, have more image context available for decision making but require more powerful hardware to implement. For the datasets utilised here, 3D data was found to outperform 2.5D data, which in turn performed better than 2D datasets. The maximum Dice scores achieved by the networks were 0.898, 0.834 and 0.794 respectively. We also considered the effect of ablating varying amounts of data on the ability of the networks to label images correctly. We achieve dice scores of 0.829, 0.827 and 0.389 for 3D single slices ablation, 3D multi-slice ablation and 2.5D middle slice ablation. In addition, we examined another practical consideration of deep learning, that of how well a network performs on data from another acquisition device. Networks trained on images from a Philips Achieva MRI system yielded Dice scores of up to 0.77 in the 3D case when tested on images captured from a GE Medical Systems HDxt (both 1.5 Tesla) without any retraining. We also considered the effect of single versus multimodal MRI data showing that single modality dice scores can be boosted from 0.825 to 0.898 when adding an extra modality.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 94%
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 93%
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
- Unsupervised Neural Network-Based Image Stitching Method for Bladder Endoscopy 93%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 94%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 94%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Fidelity Measurement of Pulse Arrival Time in Critically Ill Children Using Standard Bedside Monitoring Equipment 89%
- An Open-Access Simultaneous Electrocardiogram and Phonocardiogram Database 88%
- Comparison of feature-based indices derived from photoplethysmogram recorded from different body locations during lower body negative pressure 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.