Back

The paradoxical effects of K+ channel gain-of-function are mediated by GABAergic neuron hypoexcitability and hyperconnectivity.

Shore, A. N.; Colombo, S.; Tobin, W. F.; Petri, S.; Cullen, E. R.; Dominguez, S.; Bostick, C.; Beaumont, M.; Williams, D.; Khodagholy, D.; Yang, M.; Lutz, C. M.; Peng, Y.; Gelinas, J. N.; Goldstein, D. B.; Boland, M. J.; Frankel, W. N.; Weston, M. C.

2020-03-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.03.05.978841 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gain-of-function (GOF) variants in K+ channels cause severe childhood epilepsies, but there are no mechanisms to explain how increased K+ currents lead to network hyperexcitability. Here, we introduced a human Na+-activated K+ (KNa) channel variant (KCNT1-Y796H) into mice and, using a multiplatform approach, found motor cortex hyperexcitability and early-onset seizures, phenotypes strikingly similar to those of human patients. Although the variant increased KNa currents in cortical excitatory and inhibitory neurons, there was a selective increase in the KNa current across subthreshold voltages in inhibitory neurons, particularly in those with non-fast spiking properties, resulting in impaired excitability and AP generation. We further observed evidence of synaptic rewiring associated with hyperexcitable networks, including increases in homotypic synaptic connectivity and the ratio of excitatory-to-inhibitory synaptic input. These findings support inhibitory neuron-specific mechanisms in mediating the epileptogenic effects of K+ channel GOF, offering cell-type-specific currents and effects as promising targets for therapeutic intervention. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/978841v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@110d6e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8b63ddorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14972a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@106be1c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.