Back

A functional RNA structure in the influenza A virus ribonucleoprotein complex for segment bundling

Takizawa, N.; Higashi, K.; Kawaguchi, R. K.; Gotoh, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Kurokawa, K.

2020-03-06 microbiology
10.1101/2020.03.05.975870 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The influenza A virus genome is segmented into eight viral RNAs (vRNA). Secondary structures on vRNA are thought to be involved in the viral proliferation process, such as intersegment interactions that are necessary for segment bundling. However, the functional RNA structure on vRNA is not well known because the secondary structure of vRNA in virion was partially unwound by binding viral non-specific RNA binding proteins in a sequence-independent manner. Here, we establish the global map of the vRNA secondary structure in virion using the combination of dimethyl sulfate (DMS)-seq and selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE)-seq. By integrating DMS-seq and SHAPE-seq analyses with robust statistical analysis, we inferred quite a few bases paired regions including a pseudoknot structure on segment 5. Notably, when cells were infected with the recombinant virus which had mutations in the pseudoknot structure, the impairment of replication and packaging was observed on the other specific segment. Moreover, we analyzed the comprehensive intersegment RNA interactions in virion by ligation of interacting RNA followed by high-throughput sequencing (LIGR-seq). Our LIGR-seq analysis revealed that the intersegment interactions of the specific segment became less frequent and rearranged in the recombinant virus in concordance with the strength of genome packaging impairment. Our data provide evidence that the functional RNA structure motif on the influenza A virus genome can affect the efficiency of replication and segment bundling through the segment interactions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.