A mathematical model for estimating the age-specific transmissibility of a novel coronavirus
Zhao, Z.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Xu, J.-W.; Hu, Q.-Q.; Lei, Z.; Rui, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, L.; Yu, S.-S.; Li, J.; Liu, R.-Y.; Xie, F.; Su, Y.-Y.; Chiang, Y.-C.; Su, Y.; Zhao, B.; Chen, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundA novel coronavirus named as "SARS-CoV-2" has spread widely in many countries since December 2019, especially in China. This study aimed to quantify the age-specific transmissibility by using a mathematical model. MethodsAn age-specific susceptible - exposed - symptomatic - asymptomatic - recovered - seafood market (SEIARW) model was developed based on two suspected transmission routes (from market to person and person to person). The susceptible people from Wuhan City were divided into different age groups. We used the subscript i and j to represent age group 1 to 4 (i = j; 1: [≤] 14 years; 2: 15-44 years; 3: 45-64 years; 4: [≥] 65 years) and 1 to 5 (i = j; 1: [≤] 5 years; 2: 6-14 years; 3: 15-24 years; 4: 25-59 years; 4: [≥] 60 years), respectively. Data of reported COVID-19 cases were collected from one published literature from 26 November to 22 December, 2019 in Wuhan City, China. The age-specific transmissibility of the virus was estimated accordingly secondary attack rate (SAR). ResultsThe age-specific SEIARW model fitted with the reported data well by dividing the population into four age groups ({chi}2 = 4.99 x 10-6, P > 0.999), and five age groups ({chi}2 = 4.85 x 10-6, P > 0.999). Based on the four-age-group SEIARW model, the highest transmissibility occurred from age group 2 to 3 (SAR23 = 17.56 per 10 million persons), followed by from age group 3 to 2 (SAR32 = 10.17 per 10 million persons). The lowest transmissibility occurred from age group 1 to 2 (SAR12 = 0.002 per 10 million persons). Based on the five-age-group SEIARW model, the highest transmissibility occurred from age group 4 to 5 (SAR45 = 12.40 per 10 million persons), followed by from age group 5 to 4 (SAR54 = 6.61 per 10 million persons). The lowest transmissibility occurred from age group 3 to 4 (SAR34 = 0.0002 per 10 million persons). ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 has high transmissibility among adults and elder people but low transmissibility among children and young people.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis the molecular similarity of least common amino acid sites in ACE2 receptor to predict the potential susceptible species for SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Survival analysis of hospital length of stay of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia patients in Sichuan, China 95%
- Modeling and Prediction of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease Spreading in China Incorporating Human Migration Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lockdown may partially halt the spread of 2019 novel coronavirus in Hubei province, China 96%
- Live poultry feeding and trading network and the transmission of avian influenza A(H5N6) virus in a large city in China, 2014-2015 95%
- Ascertainment rate of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive genomic, immunological and clinical analysis of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections: a prospective, comparative cohort study 95%
- Transmission and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in 104 outside-Wuhan patients, China 94%
- Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of discharged patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 on the Qinghai plateau 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Basic reproduction number of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease in Major Endemic Areas of China: A latent profile analysis 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Risk Factors among Convalescents in Sichuan Province, China: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Uncovering COVID-19 Transmission Tree: Identifying Traced and Untraced Infections in an Infection Network 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.