Back

Thalamic activity patterns unfolding over multiple time scales predict seizure onset in absence epilepsy

Sorokin, J. M.; Williams, A. H.; Ganguli, S.; Huguenard, J. R.

2020-03-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.03.04.976688 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain has a remarkable, yet poorly understood, capacity to perform rapid dynamic switching between different cognitive states. Absence epilepsy, characterized by sudden transitions to and from highly synchronous thalamocortical oscillations, provides a unique window to investigate rapid state switching. Here we explored the transition into seizures in detail using simultaneous extracellular unit recordings from the thalamocortical circuit in the Scn8a mouse, a validated murine model of absence epilepsy. We find that trial-averaged neural firing in the thalamus, but not cortex, was transiently elevated several seconds prior to seizure onset. However, we observed large single-trial variability in pre-ictal dynamics both within and across subjects, suggesting possible heterogeneous transition dynamics into absence seizures. To quantify the single-trial amplitude and temporal variability, we developed a statistical model, which revealed that individual seizures are preceded by low dimensional neural dynamics that vary in amplitude and time across seizures. Interestingly, the single-trial pre-seizure amplitude modulation uncovered by the model showed strong periodicity over trials, suggesting that pre-ictal dynamics may co-modulate with arousal state. To our knowledge, our results are the first characterization of single-unit pre-ictal firing dynamics across the thalamocortical circuit in absence epilepsy. Our results argue that seizure-monitoring devices may be able to capitalize on seizure-by-seizure changes in pre-ictal activity to better predict seizure onset, and that the thalamus may be a source of clinically useful pre-ictal signatures.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.