Back

The impact of social distancing and epicenter lockdown on the COVID-19 epidemic in mainland China: A data-driven SEIQR model study

Zhang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Yuan, J.; Tao, Y.

2020-03-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.03.04.20031187 medRxiv
Show abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which originated in Wuhan, China, constitutes a public health emergency of international concern with a very high risk of spread and impact at the global level. We developed data-driven susceptible-exposed-infectious-quarantine-recovered (SEIQR) models to simulate the epidemic with the interventions of social distancing and epicenter lockdown. Population migration data combined with officially reported data were used to estimate model parameters, and then calculated the daily exported infected individuals by estimating the daily infected ratio and daily susceptible population size. As of Jan 01, 2020, the estimated initial number of latently infected individuals was 380.1 (95%-CI: 379.8[~]381.0). With 30 days of substantial social distancing, the reproductive number in Wuhan and Hubei was reduced from 2.2 (95%-CI: 1.4[~]3.9) to 1.58 (95%-CI: 1.34[~]2.07), and in other provinces from 2.56 (95%-CI: 2.43[~]2.63) to 1.65 (95%-CI: 1.56[~]1.76). We found that earlier intervention of social distancing could significantly limit the epidemic in mainland China. The number of infections could be reduced up to 98.9%, and the number of deaths could be reduced by up to 99.3% as of Feb 23, 2020. However, earlier epicenter lockdown would partially neutralize this favorable effect. Because it would cause in situ deteriorating, which overwhelms the improvement out of the epicenter. To minimize the epidemic size and death, stepwise implementation of social distancing in the epicenter city first, then in the province, and later the whole nation without the epicenter lockdown would be practical and cost-effective.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%