Back

The impact of social distancing and epicenter lockdown on the COVID-19 epidemic in mainland China: A data-driven SEIQR model study

Zhang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Yuan, J.; Tao, Y.

2020-03-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.03.04.20031187 medRxiv
Show abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which originated in Wuhan, China, constitutes a public health emergency of international concern with a very high risk of spread and impact at the global level. We developed data-driven susceptible-exposed-infectious-quarantine-recovered (SEIQR) models to simulate the epidemic with the interventions of social distancing and epicenter lockdown. Population migration data combined with officially reported data were used to estimate model parameters, and then calculated the daily exported infected individuals by estimating the daily infected ratio and daily susceptible population size. As of Jan 01, 2020, the estimated initial number of latently infected individuals was 380.1 (95%-CI: 379.8[~]381.0). With 30 days of substantial social distancing, the reproductive number in Wuhan and Hubei was reduced from 2.2 (95%-CI: 1.4[~]3.9) to 1.58 (95%-CI: 1.34[~]2.07), and in other provinces from 2.56 (95%-CI: 2.43[~]2.63) to 1.65 (95%-CI: 1.56[~]1.76). We found that earlier intervention of social distancing could significantly limit the epidemic in mainland China. The number of infections could be reduced up to 98.9%, and the number of deaths could be reduced by up to 99.3% as of Feb 23, 2020. However, earlier epicenter lockdown would partially neutralize this favorable effect. Because it would cause in situ deteriorating, which overwhelms the improvement out of the epicenter. To minimize the epidemic size and death, stepwise implementation of social distancing in the epicenter city first, then in the province, and later the whole nation without the epicenter lockdown would be practical and cost-effective.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science China Life Sciences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
Quantitative Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.4%
6
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
11
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
14
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
28
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%