Back

Combined analysis of single cell RNA-Seq and ATAC-Seq data reveals regulatory toggles operating in native and iPS-derived retina.

Georges, A.; Takeda, H.; Lavergne, A.; Mandai, M.; Lepiemme, F.; Karim, L.; Demeulenaere, L.; Schyns, M.; Nguyen, L.; Rakic, J.-M.; Takahashi, M.; Georges, M.

2020-03-03 developmental biology
10.1101/2020.03.02.972497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We report the generation and analysis of single-cell RNA-Seq data (> 38,000 cells) from native and iPSC-derived murine retina at four matched developmental stages spanning the emergence of the major retinal cell types. We combine information from temporal sampling, visualization of 3D UMAP manifolds, pseudo-time and RNA velocity analyses, to show that iPSC-derived 3D retinal aggregates broadly recapitulate the native developmental trajectories. However, we show relaxation of spatial and temporal transcriptome control, premature emergence and dominance of photoreceptor precursor cells, and susceptibility of dynamically regulated pathways and transcription factors to culture conditions in iPSC-derived retina. We generate bulk ATAC-Seq data for native and iPSC-derived murine retina identifying [~]125,000 peaks. We combine single-cell RNA-Seq with ATAC-Seq information and obtain evidence that approximately half the transcription factors that are dynamically regulated during retinal development may act as repressors rather than activators. We propose that sets of activators and repressors with cell-type specific expression constitute "regulatory toggles" that lock cells in distinct transcriptome states underlying differentiation. We provide evidence supporting our hypothesis from the analysis of publicly available single-cell ATAC-Seq data for adult mouse retina. We identify subtle but noteworthy differences in the operation of such toggles between native and iPSC-derived retina particularly for the Etv1, Etv5, Hes1 and Zbtb7a group of transcription factors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.