Description and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence & Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model
Piscitello, A.; Saoud, L.; Matney, M.; Borah, B. J.; Fendrick, A. M.; Lich, K. H.; Rinde, H.; Limburg, P. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMicrosimulation models of colorectal cancer (CRC) have helped inform national screening guidelines and health policy decision-making. However, detailed descriptions of particular underlying assumptions are not published, limiting access to robust platforms for exploratory analyses. We describe the development and validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) microsimulation model, a robust model built to facilitate collaborative simulation studies on disease progression and early detection through screening interventions. DesignWe used the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) CRC models, specifically CRC-SPIN, as a foundation for CRC-AIMs formulas and parameters. In addition, we developed novel submodels and recalibrated various parameters to address gaps and discrepancies in publicly available information. Along with evaluating the natural history and screening detection outcomes from CRC-AIM, we determined the impact of using different life tables (cohort versus period) on natural history outcomes. ResultsCRC-AIM demonstrated substantial cross-model validity when comparing multiple natural history and screening outputs and probability curves to those from CISNET models, particularly CRC-SPIN. Additionally, using period life tables, CRC-AIMs cumulative probability of developing CRC from ages 40 to 100 (7.1%) lies within the range of the CISNET models (6.7% to 7.2%). Using cohort tables, that probability increases to 8.0%. One notable difference is that, regardless of life table used, the cumulative probability of dying from CRC (3.2% for period; 3.8% for cohort) is slightly higher in CRC-AIM than the CISNET models (2.7% to 2.8%), due to CRC-AIMs different methodology for determining survival. Additionally, there is substantial overlap (e.g. 94-95% overall agreement for strategies on and off the efficient frontier for stool-based strategies) across multiple screening overlay outputs between CRC-AIM and the CISNET models, especially CRC-SPIN. ConclusionsWe developed and validated a robust CRC microsimulation model, CRC-AIM, and demonstrate the influence of life table choice on downstream outputs. We further describe CRC-AIMs parameters and include complete component tables to enhance transparency and encourage collaboration.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 96%
- Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians 93%
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 92%
- Development and Validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM) 91%
- Development of a prediction model for 30-day COVID-19 hospitalization and death in a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients – March 2022 - April 2023 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer in a 3-year timeframe based on machine learning algorithms 91%
- A semi-automated technique for adenoma quantification in the ApcMin mouse using FeatureCounter 91%
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Screening and Follow-up Colonoscopy Adenoma Sensitivity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the CRC-AIM Microsimulation Model 96%
- Associations of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations with Stages of Colorectal Carcinogenesis 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 92%
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 91%
- Machine learning and mechanistic modeling for prediction of metastatic relapse in breast cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.