Back

A simple model to assess Wuhan lock-down effect and region efforts during COVID-19 epidemic in China Mainland

zheming, Y.; Yuan, C.

2020-03-03 public and global health
10.1101/2020.02.29.20029561 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since COVID-19 emerged in early December, 2019 in Wuhan and swept across China Mainland, a series of large-scale public health interventions, especially Wuhan lock-down combined with nationwide traffic restrictions and Stay At Home Movement, have been taken by the government to control the epidemic. Based on Baidu Migration data and the confirmed cases data, we identified two key factors affecting the later (e.g February 27, 2020) cumulative confirmed cases in non-Wuhan region (y). One is the sum travelers from Wuhan during January 20 to January 26 (x1), which had higher infected probability but lower transmission ability because the human-to-human transmission risk of COVID-19 was confirmed and announced on January 20. The other is the "seed cases" from Wuhan before January 19, which had higher transmission ability and could be represented with the confirmed cases before January 29 (x2) due to a mean 10-day delay between infection and detection. A simple yet effective regression model then was established as follow: y= 70.0916+0.0054xx1+2.3455xx2 (n = 44, R2 = 0.9330, P<10-7). Even the lock-down date only delay or in advance 3 days, the estimated confirmed cases by February 27 in non-Wuhan region will increase 35.21% or reduce 30.74% - 48.59%. Although the above interventions greatly reduced the human mobility, Wuhan lock-down combined with nationwide traffic restrictions and Stay At Home Movement do have a determining effect on the ongoing spread of COVID-19 across China Mainland. The strategy adopted by China has changed the fast-rising curve of newly diagnosed cases, the international community should learn from lessons of Wuhan and experience from China. Efforts of 29 Provinces and 44 prefecture-level cities against COVID-19 were also assessed preliminarily according to the interpretive model. Big data has played and will continue playing an important role in public health.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
20
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%