Back

A simple model to assess Wuhan lock-down effect and region efforts during COVID-19 epidemic in China Mainland

zheming, Y.; Yuan, C.

2020-03-03 public and global health
10.1101/2020.02.29.20029561 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since COVID-19 emerged in early December, 2019 in Wuhan and swept across China Mainland, a series of large-scale public health interventions, especially Wuhan lock-down combined with nationwide traffic restrictions and Stay At Home Movement, have been taken by the government to control the epidemic. Based on Baidu Migration data and the confirmed cases data, we identified two key factors affecting the later (e.g February 27, 2020) cumulative confirmed cases in non-Wuhan region (y). One is the sum travelers from Wuhan during January 20 to January 26 (x1), which had higher infected probability but lower transmission ability because the human-to-human transmission risk of COVID-19 was confirmed and announced on January 20. The other is the "seed cases" from Wuhan before January 19, which had higher transmission ability and could be represented with the confirmed cases before January 29 (x2) due to a mean 10-day delay between infection and detection. A simple yet effective regression model then was established as follow: y= 70.0916+0.0054xx1+2.3455xx2 (n = 44, R2 = 0.9330, P<10-7). Even the lock-down date only delay or in advance 3 days, the estimated confirmed cases by February 27 in non-Wuhan region will increase 35.21% or reduce 30.74% - 48.59%. Although the above interventions greatly reduced the human mobility, Wuhan lock-down combined with nationwide traffic restrictions and Stay At Home Movement do have a determining effect on the ongoing spread of COVID-19 across China Mainland. The strategy adopted by China has changed the fast-rising curve of newly diagnosed cases, the international community should learn from lessons of Wuhan and experience from China. Efforts of 29 Provinces and 44 prefecture-level cities against COVID-19 were also assessed preliminarily according to the interpretive model. Big data has played and will continue playing an important role in public health.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
10
National Science Review
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
13
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
15
Quantitative Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
24
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%