Back

Vorpal: A Novel RNA Virus Feature-Extraction Algorithm Demonstrated Through Interpretable Genotype-to-Phenotype Linear Models

Davis, P.; Bagnoli, J.; Yarmosh, D.; Shteyman, A.; Presser, L.; Altmann, S.; Bradrick, S.; Russell, J. A.

2020-03-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.02.28.969782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the analysis of genomic sequence data, so-called "alignment free" approaches are often selected for their relative speed compared to alignment-based approaches, especially in the application of distance comparisons and taxonomic classification1,2,3,4. These methods are typically reliant on excising K-length substrings of the input sequence, called K-mers5. In the context of machine learning, K-mer based feature vectors have been used in applications ranging from amplicon sequencing classification to predictive modeling for antimicrobial resistance genes6,7,8. This can be seen as an analogy of the "bag-of-words" model successfully employed in natural language processing and computer vision for document and image classification9,10. Feature extraction techniques from natural language processing have previously been analogized to genomics data11; however, the "bag-of-words" approach is brittle in the RNA virus space due to the high intersequence variance and the exact matching requirement of K-mers. To reconcile the simplicity of "bag-of-words" methods with the complications presented by the intrinsic variance of RNA virus space, a method to resolve the fragility of extracted K-mers in a way that faithfully reflects an underlying biological phenomenon was devised. Our algorithm, Vorpal, allows the construction of interpretable linear models with clustered, representative degenerate K-mers as the input vector and, through regularization, sparse predictors of binary phenotypes as the output. Here, we demonstrate the utility of Vorpal by identifying nucleotide-level genomic motif predictors for binary phenotypes in three separate RNA virus clades; human pathogen vs. non-human pathogen in Orthocoronavirinae, hemorrhagic fever causing vs. non-hemorrhagic fever causing in Ebolavirus, and human-host vs. non-human host in Influenza A. The capacity of this approach for in silico identification of hypotheses which can be validated by direct experimentation, as well as identification of genomic targets for preemptive biosurveillance of emerging viruses, is discussed. The code is available for download at https://github.com/mriglobal/vorpal.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.8%
3
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
5
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
16
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%