Back

Languages, evolution and statistics: human sound systems were shaped by changes in bite configuration. Response to Tarasov & Uyeda (2020)

Blasi, D. E.; Moran, S.; Moisik, S.; Widmer, P.; Dediu, D.; Bickel, B.

2020-02-27 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.02.27.965400 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In Blasi et al. (2019) we have shown, through a series of statistical analyses and models, that human sound systems have been affected by a transition in bite configuration starting from the Neolithic. Tarasov and Uyeda (2020) (henceforth T&U) raise a number of observations in relation to our article. We appreciate T&Us engagement with our work and their sharing of the code and data of the analyses reported. In brief, their technical comment involves five analyses: O_LIBinomial Causal Models (BCM) C_LIO_LILinear Regression of across-area variation in labiodentals and subsistence C_LIO_LIPredictive Posterior Simulations (PPS) C_LIO_LIPoisson Linear Regression (PLR): model comparison C_LIO_LIPhylogenetic Analyses C_LI In what follows, we show that the discrepancies they report between our findings and theirs are due mostly to ill-specified models, weak (or missing) statistical evidence, and a misinterpretation of our results. After these issues are addressed, we conclude that T&Us claims do not hold.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.