Dominance patterns in dynamic environments
Devi, A.; Jain, K.
Show abstract
Natural environments are seldom static and therefore it is important to ask how a population adapts in a changing environment. We consider a finite, diploid population with intermediate dominance evolving in a periodically changing environment and study how the fixation probability of a rare mutant depends on its dominance coefficient and the rate of environmental change. We find that in slowly changing environments, the dominance patterns are the same as in the static environment, that is, if a mutant is beneficial (deleterious) when it arrives, it is more (less) likely to fix if it is dominant. But in fast changing environments, these patterns depend on the mutants fitness on arrival as well as that in the time-averaged environment. We find that in a rapidly varying environment that is neutral or deleterious on-average, an initially beneficial (deleterious) mutant that arises while selection is decreasing (increasing) has a fixation probability lower (higher) than that for a neutral mutant leading to a reversal in the standard dominance patterns. We also find that recurrent mutations decrease the phase lag between the environment and the allele frequency, irrespective of the level of dominance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint effect of changing selection and demography on the site frequency spectrum 99%
- The effects of epistasis and linkage on the invasion of locally beneficial mutations and the evolution of genomic islands 98%
- Polygenic dynamics underlying the response of quantitative traits to directional selection 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weak selection and the separation of eco-evo time scales using perturbation analysis 96%
- Coupling mountain pine beetle and forest population dynamics predicts transient outbreaks that are likely to increase in number with climate change 96%
- Accumulation of Oncogenic Mutations During Progression from Healthy Tissue to Cancer 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.