Back

Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds for Guided Alignment of Myoblast Cells

Campuzano, S.; Mogilever, N. B.; Pelling, A.

2020-02-24 biophysics
10.1101/2020.02.23.958686 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alignment and orientation of cells in vivo plays a crucial role in the functionality of tissue. A challenged faced by traditional cell culture approaches is that the majority of two-dimensional substrates fail to induce a controlled alignment of cells in vitro. To address this challenge, approaches utilizing mechanical stresses, exposure to electrical fields, structurally aligned biomaterials and/or textured microfabricated substrates, have been developed to control the organization of cells through microenvironmental stimuli. In the field of muscle tissue engineering it is often desirable to control the alignment and fusion of muscle precursor cells as it more closely resembles in vivo conditions. In this study, we utilize plant-derived cellulose biomaterials to control the in vitro alignment of C2C12 murine myoblasts. We hereby report that cells display a clear sensitivity to the highly aligned vascular bundle architectures found in decellularized celery (Apium graveolens). Conveniently, the xylem and phloem channels lie within the 10-100m diameter, which has been shown to be optimal diameter for myoblast alignment through contact guidance. Following 10 days in proliferation media, F-actin filaments were observed to be aligned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the vascular bundle. Subsequently, following 5 days in differentiation media, myoblast maintained an aligned morphology, which led to the formation of aligned myotubes. We therefore conclude that the microtopography of the vascular bundle guides muscle cell alignment. The results presented here highlight the potential of this plant-derived scaffold for in vitro studies of muscle myogenesis, where structural anisotropy is required to more closely resemble in vivo conditions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
3
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
5
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
7
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
15
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%