Polygenic modulation of lipoprotein(a)-associated cardiovascular risk
Trinder, M.; Brunham, L.
Show abstract
AimsElevated levels of lipoprotein(a) are one of the strongest inherited risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is variability in cardiovascular risk among individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a). The sources of this variability are incompletely understood. We assessed the effects of a genomic risk score (GRS) for CAD on risk of myocardial infarction among individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a). MethodsWe calculated CAD GRSs for 408,896 individuals of British white ancestry from the UK Biobank using 6.27 million common genetic variants. Lipoprotein(a) levels were measured in 310,020 individuals. The prevalence and risk of myocardial infarction versus CAD GRS percentiles were compared for individuals with and without elevated lipoprotein(a) defined as [≥]120 or 168 nmol/L ({approx}50 or 70 mg/dL, respectively). ResultsIndividuals with elevated lipoprotein(a) displayed significantly greater CAD GRSs than individuals without elevated lipoprotein(a), which was largely dependent on the influence of genetic variants within or near the LPA gene. Continuous levels of CAD GRS percentile were significantly associated with risk of myocardial infarction for individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a). Notably, the risk of myocardial infarction for males with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels, but a CAD GRS percentile in the lower quintile (<20th percentile), was less than the overall risk of myocardial infarction for males with non-elevated lipoprotein(a) levels (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.64-0.97], p=0.02). Similar results were observed for females. ConclusionThese data suggest that CAD genomic scores influence cardiovascular risk among individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a) and may aid in identifying candidates for preventive therapies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apolipoprotein E genotype, lifestyle and coronary artery disease: gene-environment interaction analyses in the UK Biobank population 96%
- LDLR Variant Classification for Improved Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Familial Hypercholesterolemia 95%
- Polygenic Hyperlipidemias and Coronary Artery Disease Risk 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease in French Canadians 96%
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 93%
- Population genomic screening leads to improved lipid management in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic prediction of coronary heart disease among 130,000 Mexican adults 94%
- Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-based step count with cardiovascular disease: a UK-Biobank cohort study 94%
- Metabolomics data improve 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction with the SCORE2 algorithm for the general population without cardiovascular disease or diabetes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic biomarkers for peripheral artery disease compared with coronary artery disease: Lipoprotein and metabolite profiling of 31,657 individuals from five prospective cohorts 94%
- The association between clonal hematopoiesis driver mutations, immune cell function and the vasculometabolic complications of obesity 93%
- Lifetime exposure to violence and early cardiometabolic risk factors in a healthy Swedish cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protective lipid-lowering genetic variants in healthy older individuals without coronary heart disease 95%
- Prognostic significance of BMI after PCI treatment in ST-elevation myocardial infarction A cohort study from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry 90%
- Creatine Kinase is Associated with Bleeding after Myocardial Infarction 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.