Back

Altered synaptic plasticity and central pattern generator dysfunction in a Drosophila model of PNKD3 paroxysmal dyskinesia

Lowe, S.; Kratschmer, P.; Jepson, J. E. C.

2020-02-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.02.20.957639 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundParoxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia type-3 (PNKD3) has been linked to gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in the hSlo1 BK potassium channel, in particular a dominant mutation (D434G) that enhances Ca2+-sensitivity. However, while BK channels play well-known roles in regulating neurotransmitter release, it is unclear whether the D434G mutation alters neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity in vivo. Furthermore, the subtypes of movement-regulating circuits impacted by this mutation are unknown. ObjectivesWe aimed to use a larval Drosophila model of PNKD3 (sloE366G/+) to examine how BK channel GOF in dyskinesia alters synaptic properties and motor circuit function. MethodsWe used video-tracking to test for movement defects in sloE366G/+ larvae, and sharp-electrode recordings to assess the fidelity of Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release and short-term plasticity at the neuromuscular junction. We then combined sharp-electrode recording with ex vivo Ca2+-imaging to investigate the functionality of the central pattern generator (CPG) driving foraging behavior in sloE366G/+ larvae. ResultsWe show that the PNKD3 mutation leads to Ca2+-dependent alterations in synaptic release and paired-pulse facilitation. Furthermore, we identify robust alterations in locomotor behaviors in sloE366G/+ larvae which were mirrored by dysfunction of the upstream, movement-generating CPG in the larval ventral nerve cord. ConclusionOur results demonstrate that a BK channel GOF mutation can alter neurotransmitter release and short-term synaptic plasticity, and result in CPG dysfunction, in Drosophila larvae. These data add to a growing body of work linking paroxysmal dyskinesias to aberrant neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity in pre-motor circuits.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.