Back

Whole exome precision oncology targeting synthetic lethal vulnerabilities across the tumor transcriptome

Lee, J. S.; Nair, N. U.; Chapman, L. M.; Sinha, S.; Wang, K.; Cha, H.; Rubin, E.; Berger, R.; Lazar, V.; Kurzrock, R.; Gilbert, M. R.; Hannenhalli, S. S.; Lee, S.-H.; Aldape, K.; Ruppin, E.

2020-02-17 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.02.16.951699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Precision oncology has made significant advances in the last few years, mainly by targeting actionable mutations in cancer driver genes. However, the proportion of patients whose tumors can be targeted therapeutically remains limited. Recent studies have begun to explore the benefit of analyzing tumor transcriptomics data to guide patient treatment, raising the need for new approaches for systematically accomplishing that. Here we show that computationally derived genetic interactions can successfully predict patient response. Assembling a broad repertoire of 32 datasets spanning more than 1,500 patients and including both tumor transcriptomics and response data, we predicted the response in 17 out of 21 targeted and 8 out of 11 checkpoint therapy datasets across 8 different cancer types with considerable accuracy, without ever training on these datasets. Analyzing the recently published multi-arm WINTHER trial, we show that the fraction of patients benefitting from transcriptomic-based treatments could potentially be markedly increased from 15% to about 85% by targeting synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in their tumors. In summary, this is the first computational approach to obtain considerable predictive performance across many different targeted and immunotherapy datasets, providing a promising new way for guiding cancer treatment based on the tumor transcriptomics of cancer patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.5%
3
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.4%
10
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
15
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
18
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%