MouseCircuits.org: An online repository to guide the circuit era of disordered affect
Anderson, K. R.; Dumitriu, D.
Show abstract
Affective disorders rank amongst the most disruptive and prevalent psychiatric diseases, resulting in enormous societal and economic burden, and immeasurable personal costs. Novel therapies are urgently needed but have remained elusive. The era of circuit-mapping in rodent models of disordered affect, ushered in by recent technological advancements allowing for precise and specific neural control, has reenergized the hope for precision psychiatry. Here, we present a novel whole-brain cumulative network and critically access the progress made to-date on circuits mediating affective-like behaviors in rodents to seek unifying principles of this cumulative data. We identified 106 original manuscripts in which optogenetics or chemogenetics were used to dissect behaviors related to fear-like, depressive-like or anxiety-like behaviors in rodents. Focusing on the 60 manuscripts that investigated pathways rather than regions, we identified emergent themes. We found that while a few pathways have been validated across similar behaviors and multiple labs, the data is mostly disjointed, with evidence of bidirectional effects of several pathways. Additionally, there is a need for analysis informed by observation prior to perturbation. Given the complex nature of brain connectivity, we argue that the compartmentalized viewpoint that develops as a consequence of fragmented pathway-specific manipulations does not readily lend itself to an integrative picture. To address this, we launched an interactive online consortium, MouseCircuits.org, an open-source platform for consolidated circuit data. This tool aims to support the shared vision of informed circuit dissection that ultimately leads to prevention and treatment of human disorders.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic stress induces sex-specific functional and morphological alterations in cortico-accumbal and cortico-tegmental pathways 94%
- A tale of two receptors: simultaneous targeting of NMDARs and 5-HT4Rs exerts additive effects against stress 94%
- miR-218 in adolescence predicts and mediates vulnerability to stress 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suppression of pyramidal neuron G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel signaling impairs prelimbic cortical function and underlies stress-induced deficits in cognitive flexibility 95%
- Effects of ketamine on GABAergic and glutamatergic activity in the mPFC: biphasic recruitment of GABA function in antidepressant-like responses 94%
- Acetylcholine signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex mediates the ability to learn an active avoidance response following learned helplessness training 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurobehavioral precursors of compulsive cocaine-seeking in dual fronto-striatal circuits 94%
- Ketamine improves anhedonic phenotypes across species: Translational evidence from the Probabilistic Reward Task 93%
- Genetic tagging uncovers a robust, selective activation of the thalamic paraventricular nucleus by adverse experiences early in life 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene expression signatures of response to fluoxetine treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses 93%
- Sex-specific GABAergic microcircuits that switch vulnerability into resilience to stress and reverse the effects of chronic stress exposure 93%
- Non-cell autonomous OTX2 transcription factor regulates anxiety-related behaviors in the mouse 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cue- versus reward-encoding basolateral amygdala projections to nucleus accumbens 93%
- SNORD90 induces glutamatergic signaling following treatment with monoaminergic antidepressants 92%
- NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex mediates chronic social defeat stress- induced anhedonia and dendritic spine loss 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.