Back

Estimation of the final size of the coronavirus epidemic by the logistic model

batista, m.

2020-02-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.02.16.20023606 medRxiv
Show abstract

In this short paper, the logistic growth model and classic susceptible-infected-recovered dynamic model are used to estimate the final size of the coronavirus epidemic.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
The European Physical Journal Plus
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Quantitative Biology
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Mathematics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Physics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Epidemics
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Medicine
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
◐ 45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.