Back

Conservation Genomic Analyses of African and Asiatic Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) Across Their Current and Historic Species Range.

Prost, S.; Machado, A. P.; Zumbroich, J.; Preier, L.; Mahtani-Williams, S.; Guschanski, K.; Brealey, J. C.; Fernandes, C.; Vercammen, P.; Godsall-Bottriell, L.; Bottriell, P.; Dalton, D. L.; Kotze, A.; Burger, P. A.

2020-02-14 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.02.14.949081 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) are majestic carnivores and the fastest land animals; yet, they are quickly heading towards an uncertain future. Threatened by habitat loss, human-interactions and illegal trafficking, there are only approximately 7,100 individuals remaining in the wild. Cheetahs used to roam large parts of Africa, and Western and Southern Asia. Today they are confined to about 9% of their original distribution. To investigate their genetic diversity and conservation status, we generated genome-wide data from historical and modern samples of all four currently recognized subspecies, along with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and major histo-compatibility complex (MHC) data. We found clear genetic differentiation between the sub-species, thus refuting earlier assumptions that cheetahs show only little population differentiation. Our genome-wide nuclear data indicate that cheetahs from East Africa may be more closely related to A. j. soemmeringii than they are to A. j. jubatus. This supports the need for further research on the classification of cheetah subspecies, as East African cheetahs are currently included in the Southern Africa subspecies, A. j. jubatus. We detected stronger inbreeding in individuals of the Critically Endangered A. j. venaticus (Iran) and A. j. hecki (Northwest Africa), and show that overall genome-wide heterozygosity in cheetah is lower than that reported for other threatened and endangered felids, such as tigers and lions. Furthermore, we show that MHC class II diversity in cheetahs is generally higher than previously reported, but still lower than in other felids. Our results provide new and important information for efficient genetic monitoring, subspecies assignments and evidence-based conservation policy decisions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
25
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%