Back

The Tumor Profiler Study: Integrated, multi-omic, functional tumor profiling for clinical decision support

Irmisch, A.; Bonilla, X.; Chevrier, S.; Lehmann, K.-V.; Singer, F.; Toussaint, N.; Esposito, C.; Mena, J.; Milani, E. S.; Casanova, R.; Stekhoven, D. J.; Wegmann, R.; Jacob, F.; Sobottka, B.; Goetze, S.; Kuipers, J.; Sarabia del Castillo, J.; Prummer, M.; Tuncel, M.; Menzel, U.; Jacobs, A.; Engler, S.; Sivapatham, S.; Frei, A.; Holtackers, R.; Gut, G.; Ficek, J.; Dummer, R.; Tumor Profiler Consortium, ; Aebersold, R.; Bacac, M.; Beerenwinkel, N.; Beisel, C.; Bodenmiller, B.; Koelzer, V. H.; Moch, H.; Pelkmans, L.; Snijder, B.; Tolnay, M.; Wollscheid, B.; Raetsch, G.; Levesque, M. P.

2020-02-14 oncology
10.1101/2020.02.13.20017921
Show abstract

Recent technological advances allow profiling of tumor samples to an unparalleled level with respect to molecular and spatial composition as well as treatment response. We describe a prospective, observational clinical study performed within the Tumor Profiler (TuPro) Consortium that aims to show the extent to which such comprehensive information leads to advanced mechanistic insights of a patients tumor, enables prognostic and predictive biomarker discovery, and has the potential to support clinical decision making. For this study of melanoma, ovarian carcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia tumors, in addition to the emerging standard diagnostic approaches of targeted NGS panel sequencing and digital pathology, we perform extensive characterization using the following exploratory technologies: single-cell genomics and transcriptomics, proteotyping, CyTOF, imaging CyTOF, pharmacoscopy, and 4i drug response profiling (4i DRP). In this work, we outline the aims of the TuPro study and present preliminary results on the feasibility of using these technologies in clinical practice showcasing the power of an integrative multi-modal and functional approach for understanding a tumors underlying biology and for clinical decision support.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 1%
11.6%
3
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 10%
7.9%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.6%
6.6%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 66%
5.5%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 38%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.9%
9
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.8%
11
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
12
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
13
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
20
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
22
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 7%
0.7%