MPRAudit Quantifies the Fraction of Variance Described by Unknown Features in Massively Parallel Reporter Assays
Siegel, D. A.; Le Tonqueze, O.; Biton, A.; Erle, D. J.; Zaitlen, N.
Show abstract
Transformative advances in molecular technologies, such as massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) and CRISPR screens, can efficiently characterize the effects of genetic and genomic variation on cellular phenotypes. Analysis approaches to date have focused on identifying individual genomic regions or genetic variants that perturb a phenotype of interest. In this work, we develop a wholistic framework (MPRAudit) to determine the global contribution of sequence to phenotypic variation across subsets of the entire experiment, opening the door to myriad novel analyses. For example, MPRAudit can reliably estimate the upper limit of predictive performance, the fraction of variation attributed to specific biological categories, and the total contribution of experimental noise. We demonstrate through simulation and application to several types of real MPRA data sets how MPRAudit can lead to an improved understanding of experimental quality, molecular biology, and guide future research. Applying MPRAudit to real MPRA data, we observe that sequence variation is the primary driver of outcome variability, but that known biological categories explain only a fraction of this variance. We conclude that our understanding of how sequence variation impacts phenotype, even at the level of MPRAs, remains open to further scientific discovery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inference of Genomic Landscapes using Ordered Hidden Markov Models with Emission Densities (oHMMed) 95%
- Estimating RNA dynamics using one time point for one sample in a single-pulse metabolic experiment 95%
- ORFeus: A Computational Method to Detect Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifts and Other Non-Canonical Translation Events 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.