Back

Functional characterization of thousands of type 2 diabetes-associated and chromatin-modulating variants under steady state and endoplasmic reticulum stress

Khetan, S.; Kales, S.; Kursawe, R.; Jillette, A.; Reilly, S. K.; Ucar, D.; Tewhey, R.; Stitzel, M. L.

2020-02-13 genomics
10.1101/2020.02.12.939348 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A major goal in functional genomics and complex disease genetics is to identify functional cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) altering CRE activity in disease-relevant cell types and environmental conditions. We tested >13,000 sequences containing each allele of 6,628 SNPs associated with altered in vivo chromatin accessibility in human islets and/or type 2 diabetes risk (T2D GWAS SNPs) for transcriptional activity in {beta} cell under steady state and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress conditions using the massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA). Approximately 30% (n=1,983) of putative CREs were active in at least one condition. SNP allelic effects on in vitro MPRA activity strongly correlated with their effects on in vivo islet chromatin accessibility (Pearson r=0.52), i.e., alleles associated with increased chromatin accessibility exhibited higher MPRA activity. Importantly, MPRA identified 220/2500 T2D GWAS SNPs, representing 104 distinct association signals, that significantly altered transcriptional activity in {beta} cells. This study has thus identified functional {beta} cell transcription-activating sequences with in vivo relevance, uncovered regulatory features that modulate transcriptional activity in {beta} cells under steady state and ER stress conditions, and substantially expanded the set of putative functional variants that modulate transcriptional activity in {beta} cells from thousands of genetically-linked T2D GWAS SNPs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.