Back

Normative modelling using deep autoencoders: a multi-cohort study on mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Pinaya, W. H. L.; Scarpazza, C.; Garcia-Dias, R.; Vieira, S.; Baecker, L.; da Costa, P. F.; Redolfi, A.; Frisoni, G. B.; Pievani, M.; Calhoun, V. D.; Sato, J. R.; Mechelli, A.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, ; Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of ageing,

2020-02-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.02.10.931824 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Normative modelling is an emerging method for quantifying how individuals deviate from the healthy populational pattern. Several machine learning models have been implemented to develop normative models to investigate brain disorders, including regression, support vector machines and Gaussian process models. With the advance of deep learning technology, the use of deep neural networks has also been proposed. In this study, we assessed normative models based on deep autoencoders using structural neuroimaging data from patients with Alzheimers disease (n=206) and mild cognitive impairment (n=354). We first trained the autoencoder on an independent dataset (UK Biobank dataset) with 11,034 healthy controls. Then, we estimated how each patient deviated from this norm and established which brain regions were associated to this deviation. Finally, we compared the performance of our normative model against traditional classifiers. As expected, we found that patients exhibited deviations according to the severity of their clinical condition. The model identified medial temporal regions, including the hippocampus, and the ventricular system as critical regions for the calculation of the deviation score. Overall, the normative model had comparable cross-cohort generalizability to traditional classifiers. In order to promote open science, we are making all scripts and the trained models available to the wider research community.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.