Back

A non-APOE polygenic score for Alzheimer's disease and APOE-ε4 have independent associations with dementia in the Health and Retirement Study

Bakulski, K. M.; Vadari, H. S.; Faul, J. D.; Heerininga, S. G.; Kardia, S. L.; Langa, K. M.; Smith, J. A.; Manly, J. J.; Mitchell, C. M.; Benke, K. S.; Ware, E. B.

2020-02-11 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.02.10.20021667 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONAlzheimers disease (AD) is a common and costly neurodegenerative disorder. A large proportion of risk is heritable and many genetic risk factors for AD have been identified. The cumulative genetic risk of known markers has not been benchmarked for dementia in a population-based sample. METHODSIn the United States population-based Health and Retirement Study (HRS) (waves 1995-2014), we evaluated the role of cumulative genetic risk for AD, with and without the APOE-{varepsilon}4 alleles, on dementia status (dementia, cognitive impairment without dementia, borderline cognitive impairment without dementia, cognitively normal). We used logistic regression, accounting for demographic covariates and genetic principal components, and analyses were stratified by European and African genetic ancestry. RESULTSIn the European ancestry sample (n=8399), both AD polygenic score excluding the APOE genetic region (odds ratio (OR)=1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.20) and the presence of any APOE-{varepsilon}4 alleles (OR=2.42; 95% CI: 1.99, 2.95) were associated with the odds of dementia relative to normal cognition in a mutually-adjusted model. In the African ancestry sample (n=1605), the presence of any APOE-{varepsilon}4 alleles was associated with 1.77 (95% CI: 1.20, 2.61) times higher odds of dementia, while the AD polygenic score excluding the APOE genetic region was not significantly associated with the odds of dementia relative to normal cognition 1.06 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.30). DISCUSSIONCumulative genetic risk for AD and APOE-{varepsilon}4 are both independent predictors of dementia. This study provides important insight into the polygenic nature of dementia and demonstrates the utility of polygenic scores in dementia research.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
4
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
5
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
6
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
7
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
15
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
20
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%