Back

Going off the rails: Impaired coherence in the speech of patients with semantic control deficits

Hoffman, P.; Cogdell-Brooke, L.; Thompson, H.

2020-02-11 neurology
10.1101/2020.02.10.20020685
Show abstract

The ability to speak coherently, maintaining focus on the topic at hand, is critical for effective communication and is commonly impaired following brain damage. Recent data suggests that executive processes that regulate access to semantic knowledge (i.e., semantic control) are critical for maintaining coherence during speech. To test this hypothesis, we assessed speech coherence in a case-series of stroke patients who exhibited deficits in semantic control. Patients were asked to speak about a series of topics and their responses were analysed using computational linguistic methods to derive measures of their global coherence (the degree to which they spoke about the topic given) and local coherence (the degree to which they maintained a topic from one utterance to the next). Compared with age-matched controls, patients showed severe impairments to global coherence but not to local coherence. Global coherence was strongly correlated with the patients performance on tests of semantic control, with greater semantic control deficits associated with poorer ability to maintain global coherence. Other aspects of speech production were also impaired but were not significantly correlated with semantic control deficits. These results suggest that semantic control deficits give rise to speech that is poorly regulated at the macrolinguistic "message" level. The preservation of local coherence in the patients suggests that automatic activation of semantic associations is relatively intact, such that each utterance they produce is connected meaningfully to the next. However, in the absence of control processes to constrain semantic activation, the content of their speech becomes increasingly distant from the original topic of discourse. This study is the first to investigate the impact of semantic control impairments on speech production at the discourse level and suggests that patients with these impairments are likely to have difficulties maintaining coherence in conversation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 0.1%
15.8%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 0.5%
13.0%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 49%
10.5%
4
Cortex
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 41%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
11
Brain and Behavior
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 1.0%
1.4%
17
Brain Stimulation
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Clinical Neurophysiology
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Cerebral Cortex
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Epilepsia
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 6%
0.7%