Spatially Explicit Modeling of 2019-nCoV Epidemic Trend based on Mobile Phone Data in Mainland China
Zhu, X.; Zhang, A.; Xu, S.; Jia, P.; Tan, X.; Tian, J.; Wei, T.; Quan, Z.; Yu, J.
Show abstract
As of February 11, 2020, all prefecture-level cities in mainland China have reported confirmed cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), but the city-level epidemical dynamics is unknown. The aim of this study is to model the current dynamics of 2019-nCoV at city level and predict the trend in the next 30 days under three possible scenarios in mainland China. We developed a spatially explicit epidemic model to consider the unique characteristics of the virus transmission in individual cities. Our model considered that the rate of virus transmission among local residents is different from those with Wuhan travel history due to the self-isolation policy. We introduced a decay rate to quantify the effort of each city to gradually control the disease spreading. We used mobile phone data to obtain the number of individuals in each city who have travel history to Wuhan. This city-level model was trained using confirmed cases up to February 10, 2020 and validated by new confirmed cases on February 11, 2020. We used the trained model to predict the future dynamics up to March 12, 2020 under different scenarios: the current trend maintained, control efforts expanded, and person-to-person contact increased due to work resuming. We estimated that the total infections in mainland China would be 72172, 54348, and 149774 by March 12, 2020 under each scenario respectively. Under the current trend, all cities will show the peak point of daily new infections by February 21. This date can be advanced to February 14 with control efforts expanded or postponed to February 26 under pressure of work resuming. Except Wuhan that cannot eliminate the disease by March 12, our model predicts that 95.4%, 100%, and 75.7% cities will have no new infections by the end of February under three scenarios. The spatial pattern of our prediction could help the government allocate resources to cities that have a more serious epidemic in the next 30 days.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distribution of Incubation Period of COVID-19 in the Canadian Context: Modeling and Computational Study 94%
- Simulating the Impacts of Interregional Mobility Restriction on the Spatial Spread of COVID-19 in Japan 94%
- Estimation of COVID-19 recovery and decease periods in Canada using machine learning algorithms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An integrated framework for building trustworthy data-driven epidemiological models: Application to the COVID-19 outbreak in New York City 95%
- Real-time Estimation of Disease Activity in Emerging Outbreaks using Internet Search Information 93%
- Dynamic interactions of influenza viruses in Hong Kong during 1998-2018 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the cumulative number of cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China from early data 94%
- Estimating relative generation times and relative reproduction numbers of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 with respect to Delta in Denmark 92%
- A Machine Learning Approach to Differentiate Between COVID-19 and Influenza Infection Using Synthetic Infection and Immune Response Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the Epidemic Dynamics and Control of COVID-19 Outbreak in China 96%
- Will the Large-scale Vaccination Succeed in Containing the COVID-19 Epidemic and How Soon? 95%
- A Data-Driven Sliding-window Pairwise Comparative Approach for the Estimation of Transmission Fitness of SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Construction of the Evolution Fitness Landscape 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.