Back

Epigenome-wide association study using prediagnostic bloods identifies a new genomic region (near TMEM204 and IFT140) associated with pancreatic cancer risk

Michaud, D.; Ruan, M.; Koestler, D. C.; Pei, D.; Marsit, C. J.; De Vivo, I.; Kelsey, K. T.

2020-02-09 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.02.07.20021121
Show abstract

BackgroundEpigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) using peripheral blood have identified specific sites of DNA methylation associated with risk of various cancers and may hold promise to identify novel biomarkers of risk; however, few studies have been performed for pancreatic cancer and none using a prospective study design. MethodsUsing a nested case-control study design, incident pancreatic cancer cases and matched controls were identified from participants who provided blood at baseline in three prospective cohort studies (Nurses Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Physicians Health Study). DNA methylation levels were measured in DNA extracted from leukocytes using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. Average follow-up period for this analysis was 13 years. ResultsA region in chromosome 16 near genesTMEM204 and IFT140 was identified as being differentially methylated in cases and controls. For some CpGs in the region, the associations were stronger with shorter time to diagnosis (e.g., OR= 5.95, 95% CI = 1.52-23.12, for top vs bottom quartile, for <5 years between blood draw and cancer diagnosis) but associations remained significantly higher even when cases were diagnosed over 10 years after blood collection. Statistically significant differences in DNA methylation levels were also observed in the gastric secretion pathway using GSEA analysis. ConclusionsChanges in DNA methylation in peripheral blood may mark alterations in metabolic or immune pathways (potentially including alterations in immune subtypes) that play a role in pancreatic cancer. Identifying new biological pathways in carcinogenesis of pancreatic cancer using EWAS approach could provide new opportunities for improving treatment and prevention.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 3%
5.3%
3
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.3%
5.3%
4
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 0.2%
4.7%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 43%
4.5%
6
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.2%
4.5%
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 73%
4.5%
8
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
10
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 27%
2.3%
12
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 10%
2.3%
13
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
14
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
16
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
18
BMC Medical Genomics
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
20
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
25
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 6%
0.7%