Biotic and abiotic factors predict the biogeography of soil microbes in the Serengeti
Stevens, B. M.; Sonderegger, D.; Johnson, N.
Show abstract
Field-based observational research is the first step in understanding the factors that predict the biogeography and community structure of soil microbes. The Serengeti National Park in Tanzania is an ideal location for this type of research because active volcanoes generate strong environmental gradients due to ash deposition and a rain shadow. Also, as one of the last remaining naturally grazed ecosystems on Earth, the Serengeti provides insights about the influence of herbivory on microbial communities. We used 16S rRNA amplicons to characterize bacterial and archaeal communities in soils from a 13-year herbivore removal experiment to study the influence of environmental factors and grazing on the natural distribution of soil microbes. We collected soil samples from seven sites, each with three naturally grazed plots and three plots that were fenced to prevent grazing by large mammalian herbivores. Soil fertility (phosphorus, nitrogen, iron, calcium, organic matter), texture, and pH were measured at each plot. Beta diversity of bacterial and archaeal communities was most strongly correlated with soil texture (R2 = 32.4%). The abundance of many operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were correlated with soil texture, and the evenness of taxa within samples increased with fine-textured soil. Removal of grazing shifted community structure, with 31 OTUs that were significant indicator taxa of the ungrazed treatment and three OTUs that were significant indicators of the grazed treatment. ImportanceOur results show that in this regional scale study, soil texture was the best environmental predictor, and grazing by large mammals also structures bacterial and archaeal communities. When large mammals are removed, as humans have been doing for millenia, there are cascading effects into the microbial world that can influence ecosystem functions like carbon and nitrogen cycles. These empirical findings from a natural tropical savannah can help inform models of the global distribution and function of soil microbes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Land-use and forest floor explain prokaryotic metacommunity structuring and spatial turnover in Amazonian forest-to-pasture conversion areas 96%
- Wine terroir and the soil microbiome: an amplicon sequencing-based assessment of the Barossa Valley and its sub-regions 96%
- Soil disturbance affects plant growth via soil microbial community shifts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community composition, and not species richness of microbes, influences decomposer functional diversity in soil 97%
- Soil protist diversity enhances prokaryotic diversity, and regulates dominant prokaryotes and the abundance of key nitrogen cycling genes 96%
- Tillage homogenizes soil bacterial communities in microaggregate fractions by facilitating dispersal 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in the genomic potential of soil bacterial and viral communities between urban greenspaces and natural arid soils 95%
- Soil chemistry and soil history significantly structure oomycete communities in Brassicaceae crop rotations 95%
- Rhizosphere Microbiomes in a Historical Maize/Soybean Rotation System respond to Host Species and Nitrogen Fertilization at Genus and Sub-genus Levels 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assembly of the amphibian microbiome is influenced by the effects of land-use change on environmental reservoirs 97%
- Microbial phylogenetic relatedness links to distinct successional patterns of bacterial and fungal communities 95%
- What's past is past, mostly: Brassicaceae host plants mask the feedback from the previous year's soil history on bacterial communities, except when the Brassicaceae hosts experience drought 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.