Back

Translational control of methionine and serine metabolic pathways underpin the paralog-specific phenotypes of Rpl22 ribosomal protein mutants in cell division and replicative longevity

Maitra, N.; He, C.; Blank, H. M.; Tsuchiya, M.; Schilling, B.; Kaeberlein, M.; Aramayo, R.; Kennedy, B. K.; Polymenis, M.

2020-02-06 molecular biology
10.1101/2020.02.05.935726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A long-standing problem is how cells that lack one of the highly similar ribosomal proteins (RPs) often display distinct phenotypes. Some may reflect general effects due to lower growth rate and ribosome levels, but a number of diverse phenotypes cannot be explained through this mechanism. Yeast and other organisms live longer when they lack specific ribosomal proteins, especially of the large 60S subunit of the ribosome. However, longevity is neither associated with the generation time of RP deletion mutants nor with bulk inhibition of protein synthesis. Here, we comprehensively queried actively dividing RP paralog mutants through the cell cycle. Our data link transcriptional, translational, and metabolic changes to phenotypes associated with the loss of paralogous RPs. We uncovered specific translational control of transcripts encoding enzymes of methionine and serine metabolism, which are part of one-carbon (1C) pathways. Cells lacking Rpl22Ap, which are long-lived, have lower levels of metabolites associated with 1C metabolism. Loss of 1C enzymes, such as the serine hydroxymethyltransferase Shm2p increased the longevity of wild type cells. These results provide a molecular basis for paralog-specific phenotypes in ribosomal mutants and underscore the significance of 1C metabolic pathways in mechanisms of cell division and cellular aging. 1C pathways exist in all organisms, including humans, and targeting the relevant enzymes could represent longevity interventions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.