Back

Effects of dopamine agonist treatment on resting-state network connectivity in Parkinson's disease

Cole, D. M.; Mohammadi, B.; Milenkova, M.; Kollewe, K.; Schrader, C.; Samii, A.; Dengler, R.; Muente, T. F.; Beckmann, C. F.

2020-01-31 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.01.31.928853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dopamine agonist (DA) medications commonly used to treat, or normalise, motor symptoms of Parkinsons disease (PD) may lead to cognitive-neuropsychiatric side effects, such as increased impulsivity in decision-making. Subject-dependent variation in the neural response to dopamine modulation within cortico-basal ganglia circuitry is thought to play a key role in these latter, non-motor DA effects. This neuroimaging study combined resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with DA modification in patients with idiopathic PD, investigating whether brain resting-state network (RSN) functional connectivity metrics identify disease-relevant effects of dopamine on systems-level neural processing. By comparing patients both On and Off their DA medications with age-matched, un-medicated healthy control subjects (HCs), we identified multiple non-normalising DA effects on frontal and basal ganglia RSN cortico-subcortical connectivity patterns in PD. Only a single isolated, potentially normalising, DA effect on RSN connectivity in sensori-motor systems was observed, within cerebro-cerebellar neurocircuitry. Impulsivity in reward-based decision-making was positively correlated with ventral striatal connectivity within basal ganglia circuitry in HCs, but not in PD patients. Overall, we provide brain systems-level evidence for anomalous DA effects in PD on large-scale networks supporting cognition and motivated behaviour. Moreover, findings suggest that dysfunctional striatal and basal ganglia signalling patterns in PD are compensated for by increased recruitment of other cortico-subcortical and cerebro-cerebellar systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.