Back

Phylogenetic signal is associated with the degree of variation in root-to-tip distances

Vankan, M.; Ho, S. Y. W.; Pardo-Diaz, C.; Duchene, D. A.

2020-01-29 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.01.28.923805 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The phylogenetic information contained in sequence data is partly determined by the overall rate of nucleotide substitution in the genomic region in question. However, phylogenetic signal is affected by various other factors, such as heterogeneity in substitution rates across lineages. These factors might be able to predict the phylogenetic accuracy of any given gene in a data set. We examined the association between the accuracy of phylogenetic inference across genes and several characteristics of branch lengths in phylogenomic data. In a large number of published data sets, we found that the accuracy of phylogenetic inference from genes was consistently associated with their mean statistical branch support and variation in their gene tree root-to-tip distances, but not with tree length and stemminess. Therefore, a signal of constant evolutionary rates across lineages appears to be beneficial for phylogenetic inference. Identifying the causes of variation in root-to-tip lengths in gene trees also offers a potential way forward to increase congruence in the signal across genes and improve estimates of species trees from phylogenomic data sets.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
3
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
13
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%