Back

The Landscape of Precision Cancer Combination Therapy: A Single-Cell Perspective

Ahmadi, S.; Sukprasert, P.; Artzi, N.; Khuller, S.; Schaffer, A. A.; Ruppin, E.

2020-01-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.01.28.923532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The availability of single-cell transcriptomics data opens new opportunities for rational design of combination cancer treatments. Mining such data, we employed combinatorial optimization techniques to explore the landscape of optimal combination therapies in solid tumors including brain, head and neck, melanoma, lung, breast and colon cancers. We assume that each individual therapy can target any one of 1269 genes encoding cell surface receptors, which may be targets of CAR-T, conjugated antibodies or coated nanoparticle therapies. As a baseline case, we studied the killing of at least 80% of the tumor cells while sparing more than 90% of the non-tumor cells in each patient, as a putative regimen. We find that in most cancer types, personalized combinations composed of at most four targets are then sufficient. However, the number of distinct targets that one would need to assemble to treat all patients in a cohort accordingly would be around 10 in most cases. Further requiring that the target genes be also lowly expressed in healthy tissues uncovers qualitatively similar trends. However, as one asks for more stringent and selective killing beyond the baseline regimen we focused on, we find that the number of targets needed rises rapidly. Emerging individual promising receptor targets include PTPRZ1, which is frequently found in the optimal combinations for brain and head and neck cancers, and EGFR, a recurring target in multiple tumor types. In sum, this systematic single-cell based characterization of the landscape of combinatorial receptor-mediated cancer treatments establishes first of their kind estimates on the number of targets needed, identifying promising ones for future development.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
59.0%
50% of probability mass above
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
5
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
6
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
10
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
18
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%