A reappraisal of polymyxin B dosing based on population pharmacokinetic model in patient with renal insufficiency
Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Pan, J.; Dai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, F.; Sun, R.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Sheng, C.; Jiao, Z.; Lin, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundCurrent FDA-approved label recommends polymyxin B dosing should be adjusted according to renal function, despite several studies proved poor correlation between polymyxin B PK and creatinine clearance. The study aims to assess the impact of renal function on polymyxin B metabolism and identify an alternate dosing strategy by population analysis. MethodsBlood samples from adult patients were collected at steady state during routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was employed to build a population PK model of polymyxin B. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to design polymyxin B dosing regimens across various renal function. ResultsPharmacokinetic analyses included 112 polymyxin B concentrations at steady state from 32 adult patients aged 37-93 received intravenous polymyxin B (100-200 mg/d). The creatinine clearance in patients was 5.91-244 mL/min. In the final population PK model, CrCL was the significant covariate on CL (typical value, 1.59 L/hr; between-subject variability, 13%). Mean (SD) individual empirical Bayesian estimates of CL was 1.75 (0.43) L/hr. A new dosing strategy combining the PK/PD targets and Monte Carlo simulation indicated that polymyxin B dose reductions improved the probability of achieving optimal exposures in simulated patients with renal insufficiency. For severe infections caused by organisms with MIC of [≥] 2 mg/L, though a high daily dose (e.g. 200mg/day) would possible for bacterial eradication, the risk of nephrotoxicity is significantly increased. ConclusionA population PK model was established to develop individualized polymyxin B dosage regimens that the dose of polymyxin B should be adjusted according to CrCL.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment Analysis of Vancomycin after Intermittent Dosing in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis 96%
- The Pharmacodynamic-Toxicodynamic Relationship of AUC and CMAX in Vancomycin Induced Kidney Injury in an Animal Model 94%
- Predicting the Disposition of the Antimalarial Drug Artesunate and its Active Metabolite Dihydroartemisinin Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation on the interaction between nifedipine and ritonavir containing antivirus regimens: a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis 94%
- Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data 93%
- External validation of the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital in pediatric patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling? 94%
- Pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate intracellular favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5’-triphosphate exposure to support posology for SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Seeking an optimal dosing regimen for OZ439-DSM265 combination therapy for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determination of vancomycin exposure target and individualized dosing recommendations for neonates: model informed precision dosing 93%
- Serum Concentration of Continuously administered Vancomycin influences Efficacy and Safety in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review 91%
- No one-size-fits-all approach: Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of serum concentrations of continuously administered vancomycin in critically ill adults reveals different target serum concentrations depending on disease severity 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.