Back

A reappraisal of polymyxin B dosing based on population pharmacokinetic model in patient with renal insufficiency

Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Pan, J.; Dai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, F.; Sun, R.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Sheng, C.; Jiao, Z.; Lin, G.

2020-01-28 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2020.01.24.20018481 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCurrent FDA-approved label recommends polymyxin B dosing should be adjusted according to renal function, despite several studies proved poor correlation between polymyxin B PK and creatinine clearance. The study aims to assess the impact of renal function on polymyxin B metabolism and identify an alternate dosing strategy by population analysis. MethodsBlood samples from adult patients were collected at steady state during routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was employed to build a population PK model of polymyxin B. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to design polymyxin B dosing regimens across various renal function. ResultsPharmacokinetic analyses included 112 polymyxin B concentrations at steady state from 32 adult patients aged 37-93 received intravenous polymyxin B (100-200 mg/d). The creatinine clearance in patients was 5.91-244 mL/min. In the final population PK model, CrCL was the significant covariate on CL (typical value, 1.59 L/hr; between-subject variability, 13%). Mean (SD) individual empirical Bayesian estimates of CL was 1.75 (0.43) L/hr. A new dosing strategy combining the PK/PD targets and Monte Carlo simulation indicated that polymyxin B dose reductions improved the probability of achieving optimal exposures in simulated patients with renal insufficiency. For severe infections caused by organisms with MIC of [≥] 2 mg/L, though a high daily dose (e.g. 200mg/day) would possible for bacterial eradication, the risk of nephrotoxicity is significantly increased. ConclusionA population PK model was established to develop individualized polymyxin B dosage regimens that the dose of polymyxin B should be adjusted according to CrCL.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.3%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
4
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
14
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
18
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%