Back

Deforestation in Belize- What, Where and Why

Folkard-Tapp, H. R.

2020-01-24 ecology
10.1101/2020.01.23.915447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tropical forests of Belize are a dynamic environment influenced by much disturbance throughout their natural history. In recent times, logging and agriculture have once more become the dominant drivers of land use change, yet the Belizean forests remain some of the most complete swathes of forest in the region. However, it is largely unknown how the abundance of specific forest types has changed. This study aims to critically assess whether valuable habitat types have been disproportionately affected by deforestation between 1986 and 2018. ENVI Classic 5.5 was used to calculate the NDVI values of Landsat imagery, with values over 0.6 deemed to indicate primary forest. ArcMap 10.6 was used for detecting change in forest cover between 1986 and 2018, in addition to digitising colonial maps. Results show variation in the percentage of forest lost between habitat types, with a bias towards forests fragmented by or replaced by agriculture, particularly in the north and along the Guatemalan border. The protected area network was found overall to have little influence on deforestation, though this varies between reserves. Of the three forest types experiencing the highest percentage of forest loss, only Ensino-Pixoy occurs exclusively outside protected areas. Cohune Santa-Maria and Sapote-Mahogany are found at least partially within protected areas and experience loss within them. Analysis of IUCN ratings of forest species revealed data deficiency, particularly concerning taxa indigenous to Mesoamerica, against which this study recommends further vegetation studies. to allow recommendations for protection of particularly threatened forest types. A review of management strategies in protected areas, especially the Caracol Archaeological Reserve, is necessary to avert the worrying deforestation trends this study has identified. The country-wide deforestation data can be used to advise future forest policy as well as calculation of national carbon stocks or determining integrity of ecosystem services.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%