Back

What causes different coronal curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis?

Pasha, S.

2020-01-21 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.01.21.913707 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spinal column in otherwise healthy adolescents. The underlying mechanisms associated with the spinal deformity development have been explored which delineated the role of the sagittal curvature of the spine. The patterns of the spinal deformity vary between the AIS patients as shown in several classification systems. It remains to further investigate how variations in sagittal profiles result in different coronal plane deformities in AIS and how these deformation patterns are intrinsically different. MethodsA total of 71 Lenke 1 and 52 Lenke 5 AIS patients were included retrospectively. The 3D models of the spine were generated from biplanar radiographs to calculate the clinical spinal parameters, vertebral axial rotations, and the 3D centerline of the spinal curvature. A classification based on the centerlines axial plane projection was developed. The 3D curvature of the centerline was calculated at each point. A 2D elastic rod finite element model (FEM) of the sagittal spinal curvature for each axial subtype was developed to calculate the 3D deformity of the spine under gravity and axial torsion. Differences in the axial clusters clinical parameters, curvature of the spine, and the deformation patterns of the FEM were compared. The characteristics of the sagittal curvature of these axial clusters were determined. ResultsLenke1 was divided into two axial groups (I and II) whereas the Lenke 5 cohort all had the same axial projection pattern (loop shape). T5-T12 kyphosis was significantly different between Lenke1-Group I and the other two groups, p=0.04. The vertebral rotation in both Lenke1-Group I and Lenke 5 had only one maximum value and the FEM deformed in a loop shaped whereas Lenke1-group II showed two maximum values for vertebral rotation and the FEM of the centerline deformed in a lemniscate shape. The ratio of the spinal arc lengths above and below the sagittal inflection points for Lenke1-Groups I and II and Lenke 5 were 0.52, 1.16, and 3.24, respectively. ConclusionVariations in the axial plane projection of the curve were observed within Lenke types. Lenke 1- Group I and Lenke 5 showed similar 3D curve characteristics suggesting one 3D curve whereas Lenke1-Group II, with two 3D curves, behaved differently. The length of the spinal arcs above and below the sagittal inflection point related to the patterns of axial deformity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.7%
2
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
6
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%