Frequent Daytime Napping is Detrimental to Human Health: A phenotype-wide Mendelian Randomization Study
Chen, L.; Tian, A.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Pan, X.; He, C.; Liu, W.; Chen, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundIt remains controversial whether daytime napping is beneficial for human health. ObjectiveTo examine the causal relationship between daytime napping and the risk for various human diseases. DesignPhenotype-wide Mendelian randomization study. SettingNon-UK Biobank cohorts reported in published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provided the outcome phenotypes in the discovery stage. The UK Biobank cohort provided the outcome phenotypes in the validation stage. ParticipantsThe UK Biobank GWAS included 361,194 European-ancestry residents in the UK. Non-UKBB GWAS included various numbers of participants. ExposureSelf-reported daytime napping frequency. Main outcome measureA wide-spectrum of human health outcomes including obesity, major depressive disorder, and high cholesterol. MethodsWe examined the causal relationship between daytime napping frequency in the UK Biobank as exposure and a panel of 1,146 health outcomes reported in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), using a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. The significant findings were further validated in the UK Biobank health outcomes of 4,203 human traits and diseases. The causal effects were estimated using a fixed-effect inverse variance weighted model. MR-Egger intercept test was applied to detect horizontal pleiotropy, along with Cochrans Q test to assess heterogeneity among the causal effects of IVs. FindingsThere were significant causal relationships between daytime napping frequency and a wide spectrum of human health outcomes. In particular, we validated that frequent daytime napping increased the risks of major depressive disorder, obesity and abnormal lipid profile. InterpretationThe current study showed that frequent daytime napping mainly had adverse impacts on physical and mental health. Cautions should be taken for health recommendations on daytime napping. Further studies are necessary to precisely define the best daytime napping strategies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 93%
- Exploring health in the UK Biobank: associations with sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and environmental exposures 92%
- Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 91%
- Association between psychological distress trajectories from adolescence to midlife and mental health during the pandemic: Evidence from two British birth cohorts 90%
- Metabolomics dissection of depression heterogeneity and related cardiometabolic risk 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses 92%
- Correlations between human mating partners: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 22 traits and raw data analysis of 133 traits in the UK Biobank 92%
- Genetic correlates of socio-economic status influence the pattern of shared heritability across mental health traits 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.