Back

Mechanical Regulation of Microvascular Angiogenesis

Ruehle, M. A.; Eastburn, E. A.; LaBelle, S. A.; Krishnan, L.; Weiss, J. A.; Boerckel, J. D.; Wood, L. B.; Guldberg, R. E.; Willett, N. J.

2020-01-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.01.14.906354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neovascularization is a critical early step toward successful tissue regeneration during wound healing. While vasculature has long been recognized as highly mechanosensitive (to fluid shear, pulsatile luminal pressure, etc.), the effects of extracellular matrix strains on angiogenesis are poorly understood. Previously, we found that dynamic matrix compression in vivo potently regulated neovascular growth during tissue regeneration; however, whether matrix deformations directly regulate00 angiogenesis remained unknown. Here, we tested the effects of load initiation time, strain magnitude, and mode of compressive deformation (uniform compression vs. compressive indentation that also introduced shear stress) on neovascularization and key angiogenic and mechanotransduction signaling pathways by microvascular fragments in vitro. We hypothesized that neovascularization would be enhanced by delayed, moderate compression and inhibited by early, high magnitude compression and by compressive indentation. Consistent with our hypothesis, early, high magnitude loading inhibited vessel growth, while delayed loading enhanced vessel growth. Compressive indentation led to longer, more branched networks than uniform compression - particularly at high strain magnitude. Gene expression was differentially regulated by time of load initiation; genes associated with active angiogenic sprouts were downregulated by early loading but upregulated by delayed loading. Canonical gene targets of the YAP/TAZ mechanotransduction pathway were increased by loading and abrogated by pharmacological YAP inhibition. Together, these data demonstrate that neovascularization is directly responsive to dynamic matrix strain and is particularly sensitive to the timing of load initiation. This work further identifies putative mechanoregulatory angiogenic mechanisms and implicates a critical role for dynamic mechanical cues in vascularized tissue regeneration. Statement of SignificanceMechanical cues influence tissue regeneration, and although vasculature is known to be mechanically sensitive, remarkably little is known about the effects of bulk extracellular matrix deformation on the nascent vessel networks found in healing tissues. Here, we demonstrated that load initiation time, magnitude, and mode all regulate microvascular growth, as well as upstream angiogenic and mechanotransduction signaling pathways. Across all tested magnitudes and modes, microvascular network formation and upstream signaling were powerfully regulated by the timing of load initiation. This work provides a new foundational understanding of how extracellular matrix mechanics regulate angiogenesis and has critical implications for clinical translation of new regenerative medicine therapies and physical rehabilitation strategies designed to enhance revascularization during tissue regeneration.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.8%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
15
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
23
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
27
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%