Time course and shared neurocognitive mechanisms of mental imagery and visual perception
Maier, M.; Froemer, R.; Rost, J.; Sommer, W.; Abdel Rahman, R.
Show abstract
When we imagine an object and when we actually see that object, similar brain regions become active. Yet, the time course and mechanisms with which imagery engages perceptual networks remain to be better understood. An emerging view holds that imagery and perception follow distinct dynamics during early visual processing with similarities arising only during later, high-level visual processing. However, confounds of visual stimulation and paradigms favoring observation of high-level processes associated with subjective imagery strength may have precluded evidence of earlier shared mechanisms. We therefore manipulated prior knowledge that informs early-stage top-down predictions and tracked electrophysiological brain responses while fully controlling visual stimulation. Participants saw and imagined objects associated with varying amounts of semantic knowledge. Imagery and perception were equally influenced by knowledge at an early stage (P1 component), revealing shared mechanisms that support low-level visual processing. This finding complements previous research by showing that imagery is not merely perception in reverse. Instead, in line with the predictive processing framework, both, perception and imagery are active and constructive processes that share top-down mechanisms already in early phases of processing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world objects scaffold visual working memory for features: Increased neural engagement when colors are remembered as part of meaningful objects 97%
- Spatial contextual information modulates affordance processing and early electrophysiological markers of scene perception 97%
- Neural Dynamics Underlying Repeated Learning of Visual Image Sequences 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between individual differences in dual process and electrophysiological signatures of familiarity and recollection during retrieval 97%
- Usefulness of a familiarity signal during recognition depends on test format: Neurocognitive evidence for a core assumption of the CLS framework 96%
- Alpha/beta power decreases during episodic memory formation predict the magnitude of alpha/beta power decreases during subsequent retrieval 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.