A multi-layered systems approach for renal cell carcinoma
Cooley, L.; Rudewicz, J.; Souleyreau, W.; Clarke, K.; Falciani, F.; Dufies, M.; Verbeke, S.; Emanuelli, A.; Benzekry, S.; Taing, C.; Ribot, E. J.; Miraux, S.; Lambrechts, D.; Modave, E.; Pineau, R.; Derieppe, M.-A.; Ambrosetti, D.; Bernhard, J.-C.; Ravaud, A.; Negrier, S.; Ferrero, J.-M.; Pages, G.; Nikolski, M.; Bikfalvi, A.
Show abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) still lacks prognostic and predictive biomarkers to monitor the disease and the response to therapy. The usual strategy in translational research is to start from human samples, to identify molecular markers and gene networks and then to functionally validate them in vitro and in animal models. We devised herein a completely opposite strategy from "mouse to man" by performing an aggressiveness screen and used functional genomics, imaging, clinical data and computational approaches in order to discover molecular pathways and players in renal cancer development and metastasis. Multiple cell lines for primary tumor growth, survival in the blood circulation and lung metastasis or metastatic spread from the primary tumor were generated and analyzed using a multi-layered approach which includes large-scale transcriptome, genome and methylome analyses. Transcriptome and methylome analyses demonstrated distinct clustering in three different groups. Remarkably, DNA sequencing did not show significant genomic variations in the different groups which indicates absence of clonal selection during the in vivo amplification process. Transcriptome analysis revealed distinct signatures of tumor aggressiveness which were validated in patient cohorts. Methylome analysis of full-length DNA allowed clustering of the same groups and revealed clinically relevant signatures. Furthermore, we identified SAA2 and CFB as soluble prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the therapeutic response. We also uncovered IL34 as another soluble prognostic biomarker and key regulator of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) progression. This was also functionally validated in vivo, and a mathematical model of IL34-dependent primary tumor growth and metastasis development was provided. These results indicate that such multilayered analysis in a RCC animal model leads to meaningful results that are of translational significance. One Sentence SummaryAn aggressiveness screen with multilayer systems analysis to identify signatures and biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 97%
- Integrative Molecular Characterization of Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Reveals Determinants of Poor Prognosis and Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 97%
- Predicting immunotherapy response in advanced bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of six independent cohorts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phenotypic plasticity underlies local invasion and distant metastasis in colon cancer 97%
- Unveiling the influence of tumor and immune signatures on immune checkpoint therapy in advanced lung cancer 96%
- Alternative splicing downstream of EMT enhances phenotypic plasticity and malignant behavior in colon cancer 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term patient-derived ovarian cancer organoids closely recapitulate tumor of origin and clinical response 95%
- Essential role of PLD2 in hypoxia-induced stemness and therapy resistance in ovarian tumors 95%
- LAMC2 marks a tumor-initiating cell population with an aggressive signature in pancreatic cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of advanced renal cell cancer to individualize treatment strategy 96%
- Long-term maintenance of patient-specific characteristics in tumoroids from six cancer indications in a common base culture media system 96%
- Multi-omic signatures identify pan-cancer classes of tumors beyond tissue of origin. 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.