Back

Cell segmentation using deep learning: comparing label and label-free approaches using hyper-labeled image stacks

Cameron, W. D.; Bui, C. V.; Bennett, A. M.; Chang, H. H.; Rocheleau, J. V.

2020-01-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.01.09.900605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep learning provides an opportunity to automatically segment and extract cellular features from high-throughput microscopy images. Many labeling strategies have been developed for this purpose, ranging from the use of fluorescent markers to label-free approaches. However, differences in the channels available to each respective training dataset make it difficult to directly compare the effectiveness of these strategies across studies. Here we explore training models using subimage stacks composed of channels sampled from larger, hyper-labeled, image stacks. This allows us to directly compare a variety of labeling strategies and training approaches on identical cells. This approach revealed that fluorescence-based strategies generally provide higher segmentation accuracies but were less accurate than label-free models when labeling was inconsistent. The relative strengths of label and label-free techniques could be combined through the use of merging fluorescence channels and out-of-focus brightfield images. Beyond comparing labeling strategies, using subimage stacks for training was also found to provide a method of simulating a wide range of labeling conditions, increasing the ability of the final model to accommodate a greater range of experimental setups.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
4
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
30
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%