Back

In silico analyses reveal new putative Breast Cancer RNA-binding proteins

Guerrero, S.; Lopez-Cortes, A.; Garcia-Cardenas, J. M.; Armendariz-Castillo, I.; Zambrano, A. K.; Indacochea, A.; Perez-Villa, A.; Yumiceba, V.; Guevara-Ramirez, P.; Jacome-Alvarado, A.; Leone, P. E.; Paz-y-Mino, C.

2020-01-09 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.01.08.898965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-associated death among women worldwide. Despite treatment efforts, advanced BC with distant organ metastases is considered incurable. A better understanding of BC molecular processes is therefore of great interest to identify new therapeutic targets. Although large-scale efforts, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), have completely redefined cancer drug development, diagnosis, and treatment, additional key aspects of tumor biology remain to be discovered. In that respect, post-transcriptional regulation of tumorigenesis represents an understudied aspect of cancer research. As key regulators of this process, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are emerging as critical modulators of tumorigenesis but only few have defined roles in BC. To unravel new putative BC RBPs, we have performed in silico analyses of all human RBPs in three major cancer databases (TCGA-Breast Invasive Carcinoma, the Human Protein Atlas, and the Cancer Dependency Map project) along with complementary bioinformatics resources (STRING protein-protein interactions and the Network of Cancer Genes 6.0). Thus, we have identified six putative BC progressors (MRPL13, SCAMP3, CDC5L, DARS2, PUF60, and PLEC), and five BC suppressors RBPs (SUPT6H, MEX3C, UPF1, CNOT1, and TNKS1BP1). These proteins have never been studied in BC but show similar cancer-associated features than well-known BC proteins. Further research should focus on the mechanisms by which these proteins promote or suppress breast tumorigenesis, holding the promise of new therapeutic pathways along with novel drug development strategies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.