Back

Bacterial carotenoids suppress Caenorhabditis elegans surveillance and defense of translational dysfunction

Govindan, J. A.; Jayamani, E.; Lelyveld, V.; Szostak, J. W.; Ruvkun, G.

2020-01-09 genomics
10.1101/2020.01.08.898668 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial toxins and virulence factors often target the eukaryotic translation machinery. Caenorhabditis elegans surveils for such microbial attacks by monitoring translational competence, and if a deficit is detected, particular drug detoxification and bacterial defense genes are induced. The bacteria Kocuria rhizophila has evolved countermeasures to animal translational surveillance and defense pathways. Here, we used comprehensive genetic analysis of Kocuria rhizophila to identify the bacterial genetic pathways that inhibit C. elegans translational toxin surveillance and defense. Kocuria rhizophila mutations that disrupt its ability to disable animal immunity and defense map to multiple steps in the biosynthesis of a 50-carbon bacterial carotenoid from 5 carbon precursors. Extracts of the C50 carotenoid from wild type K. rhizophila could restore this bacterial anti-immunity activity to K. rhizophila carotenoid biosynthetic mutant. Corynebacterium glutamicum, also inhibits the C. elegans translation detoxification response by producing the C50 carotenoid decaprenoxanthin, and C. glutamicum carotenoid mutants are defective in this suppression of C. elegans detoxification. Consistent with the salience of these bacterial countermeasures to animal drug responses, bacterial carotenoids sensitize C. elegans to drugs that target translation and inhibit food aversion behaviors normally induced by protein translation toxins or mutations. The surveillance and response to toxins is mediated by signaling pathways conserved across animal phylogeny, suggesting that these bacterial carotenoids may also suppress such human immune and toxin responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.