Back

Polygenic modelling of treatment effect heterogeneity

Xu, Z. M.; Burgess, S.

2020-01-10 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2020.01.06.20016618
Show abstract

Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to assess the effect of intervening on a risk factor using observational data. We consider the scenario in which there is a pharmacomimetic (that is, treatment-mimicking) genetic variant that can be used as a proxy for a particular pharmacological treatment that changes the level of the risk factor. If the association of the pharmacomimetic genetic variant with the risk factor is stronger in one subgroup of the population, then we may expect the effect of the treatment to be stronger in that subgroup. We test for gene-gene interactions in the associations of variants with a modifiable risk factor, where one genetic variant is treated as pharmacomimetic and the other as an effect modifier, to find genetic sub-groups of the population with different predicted response to treatment. If individual genetic variants that are strong effect modifiers cannot be found, moderating variants can be combined using a random forest of interaction trees method into a polygenic response score, analogous to a polygenic risk score for risk prediction. We illustrate the application of the method to investigate effect heterogeneity in the effect of statins on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 4%
15.4%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 50%
10.2%
3
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
5.3%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 4%
3.0%
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Statistics in Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 25%
2.4%
11
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.9%
12
Bioinformatics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%