Overcoming Genetic Drop-outs in Variants-based Lineage Tracing from Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data
Lu, T.; Park, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhan, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Wang, T.
Show abstract
Lineage tracing provides key insights into the fates of individual cells in complex tissues. Recent works on lineage reconstruction based on the single-cell expression data are suitable for short time frames while tracing lineage based on more stable genetic markers is needed for studies that span time scales over months or years. However, variant calling from the single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data suffers from "genetic drop-outs", including low coverage and allelic bias, which presents significant obstacles for lineage reconstruction. Prior studies focused only on mitochondrial (chrM) variants and need to be expanded to the whole genome to capture more variants with clearer physiological meaning. However, non-chrM variants suffer even more severe drop-outs than chrM variants, although drop-outs affect all variants. We developed strategies to overcome genetic drop-outs in scRNA-Seq-derived whole genomic variants for accurate lineage tracing, and we developed SClineger, a Bayesian Hierarchical model, to implement our approach. Our validation analyses on a series of sequencing protocols demonstrated the necessity of correction for genetic drop-outs and consideration of variants in the whole genome, and also showed the improvement that our approach provided. We showed that genetic-based lineage tracing is applicable for single-cell studies of both tumors and non-tumor tissues using our approach, and can reveal novel biological insights not afforded by expressional analyses. Interestingly, we showed that cells of various lineages grew under the spatial constraints of their respective organs during the developmental process. Overall, our work provides a powerful tool that can be applied to the large amounts of already existing scRNA-Seq data to construct the lineage histories of cells and derive new knowledge.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive characterization of single cell full-length isoforms in human and mouse with long-read sequencing 97%
- geneBasis: an iterative approach for unsupervised selection of targeted gene panels from scRNA-seq. 97%
- Clonal expansion dictates the efficacy of mitochondrial lineage tracing in single cells 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- MQuad enables clonal substructure discovery using single cell mitochondrial variants 97%
- Fully-automated and ultra-fast cell-type identification using specific marker combinations from single-cell transcriptomic data 97%
- A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alignment of single-cell RNA-seq samples without over-correction using kernel density matching 96%
- scTIE: data integration and inference of gene regulation using single-cell temporal multimodal data 96%
- Harnessing Agent-Based Modeling in CellAgentChat to Unravel Cell-Cell Interactions from Single-Cell Data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interpretable trajectory inference with single-cell Linear Adaptive Negative-binomial Expression (scLANE) testing 96%
- cellHarmony: Cell-level matching and holistic comparison of single-cell transcriptomes 96%
- CelLink: integrating single-cell multi-omics data with weak feature linkage and imbalanced cell populations 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.