Mapping biology from mouse to man using transfer learning
Stumpf, P. S.; Du, D.; Imanishi, H.; Kunisaki, Y.; Semba, Y.; Noble, T.; Smith, R. C.; Rose-Zerili, M.; West, J. J.; Oreffo, R. O.; Niranjan, M.; Akashi, K.; Arai, F.; MacArthur, B. D.
Show abstract
Biomedical research often involves conducting experiments on model organisms in the anticipation that the biology learnt from these experiments will transfer to the human. Yet, it is commonly the case that biology does not transfer effectively, often for unknown reasons. Despite its importance to translational research this transfer process is not currently rigorously quantified. Here, we show that transfer learning - the branch of machine learning that concerns passing information from one domain to another - can be used to efficiently map biology from mouse to man, using the bone marrow (BM) as a representative example of a complex tissue. We first trained an artificial neural network (ANN) to accurately recognize various different cell types in mouse BM using data obtained from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) experiments. We found that this ANN, trained exclusively on mouse data, was able to identify individual human cells obtained from comparable scRNA-Seq experiments of human BM with 83% overall accuracy. However, while some human cell types were easily identified, others were not, indicating important differences in biology. To obtain a more accurate map of the human BM we then retrained the mouse ANN using scRNA-Seq data from a limited sample of human BM cells. Typically, less than 10 human cells of a given type were needed to accurately learn its representation in the updated model. In some cases, human cell identities could be inferred directly from the mouse ANN without retraining, via a process of biologically-guided zero-shot learning. These results show how machine learning can be used to reconstruct complex biology from limited data and have broad implications for biomedical research.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Expression of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) identifies lymphoid-primed progenitors in human bone marrow 96%
- Joint profiling of DNA and proteins in single cells to dissect genotype-phenotype associations in leukemia 95%
- A statistical framework for differential pseudotime analysis with multiple single-cell RNA-seq samples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Latent factor modelling of scRNA-seq data uncovers novel pathways dysregulated in cell subsets of autoimmune disease patients 94%
- Exploration of cell development pathways through high dimensional single cell analysis in trajectory space 94%
- Characterizing adjuvants' effects at the murine immunoglobulin repertoire level 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redundant mechanisms driven independently by RUNX1 and GATA2 for hematopoietic development 95%
- Single cell proteomics characterization of bone marrow hematopoiesis with distinct Ras pathway lesions. 94%
- Lfc/Arhgef2 regulates mitotic spindle orientation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and is essential for productive hematopoiesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Complex genotype-phenotype relationships shape the response to treatment of Down Syndrome Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia 94%
- Mebendazole for Differentiation Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Identified by a Lineage Maturation Index 94%
- Topological data analysis of pattern formation of human induced pluripotent stem cell colonies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.