Back

Identifying triplex binding rules in vitro leads to creation of a new synthetic regulatory tool in vivo

Kaufmann, B.; Willinger, O.; Eden, N.; Kermas, L.; Anavy, L.; Solomon, O.; Atar, O.; Yakhini, Z.; Goldberg, S.; Amit, R.

2019-12-27 synthetic biology
10.1101/2019.12.25.888362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nature provides a rich toolbox of dynamic nucleic acid structures that are widespread in cells and affect multiple biological processes1. Recently, non-canonical structures gained renewed scientific and biotechnological interest2,3. One particularly intriguing form of such structures are triplexes4 in which a single-stranded nucleic acid molecule interacts via Hoogsteen bonds with a DNA/RNA double helix5. Despite extensive research in vitro6-9, the underlying rules for triplex formation remain debated and evidence for triplexes in vivo is circumstantial10-12. Here, we demonstrate the development of a deep-sequencing platform termed Triplex-Seq to systematically refine the DNA triplex code and identify high affinity triplex forming oligo (TFO) variants. We identified a preference for short G-rich motifs using an oligo-library with a mix of all four bases. These high-information content motifs formed specific high-affinity triplexes in a pH-independent manner and stability was increased with G-rich double-stranded molecules. We then conjugated one high-affinity and one low-affinity variant to a VP48 peptide and studied these synthetic biomolecules in mammalian cells. Using these peptide-oligo constructs (POCs), we demonstrated possible triplex-induced down-regulation activity in 544 differentially expressed genes. Our results show that deep-sequencing platforms can substantially expand our understanding of triplex binding rules, which in turn has led to the development of a functional non-genetically encoded regulatory tool for in vivo applications.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.