Stroke Volume Reserve is an Independent Predictor of Survival and Need for Advanced Therapies in Systolic Heart Failure Patients
Selevany, I.; Morris, T.; Vaida, F.; Adler, E. D.; Greenberg, B. H.; Kim, P. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCurrent predictors of clinical deterioration in patients with heart-failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have limited accuracy. We investigated whether stroke volume reserve index (SVRI) would predict 1-year mortality and need for advanced therapies in HFrEF patients. MethodsWe retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 104 ambulatory HFrEF patients (59{+/-}11 years, 89% men) at our center who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) from January 2017 to September 2018. The primary outcome was defined as heart-transplantation, urgent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or death within 1 year of evaluation. SVRI was estimated at rest and at anaerobic threshold (AT) by VO2 (oxygen consumption)/pulse and previously validated estimates of C[a-v]O2 (arteriovenous difference in oxygen content). Multivariate regression selected the optimal predictors from clinical, CPET and right heart catheterization data. ResultsAmong HFrEF patients studied, 39 (37.5%) deteriorated: 16 required heart-transplantation, 8 required LVADs and 15 died. SVRI 128% or less was the best predictor (OR 6.69, p=0.001), followed by an invasively determined resting cardiac index 2 L/min/m2 or less (OR 3.18, p=0.02), and peak VO2 below the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) cut-off (OR 4.15, p=0.01). A scoring system derived from the SVRI (less than 128%: 2 points), peak VO2 (below the ISHLT cut-off: 1 point), and cardiac index (less than 2 L/min/m2: 1 point) predicted clinical deterioration with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 81%. ConclusionsSVRI is a non-invasive measurement that may predict deterioration in HFrEF patients more accurately than currently recommended predictors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Obesity Modifies Clinical Outcomes of Right Ventricular Dysfunction 95%
- Biomarkers of RV dysfunction in HFrEF identified by direct tissue proteomics: extracellular proteins fibromodulin and fibulin-5 95%
- Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 94%
- Cardiac Output During Exercise: Thermodilution versus Direct Fick 93%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 93%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 93%
- Artificial Intelligence Methods to Detect Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AIM-HFpEF) within Electronic Health Records: An equitable disease prediction model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- Impact of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplant on acute myocardial infarction and heart failure mortality and readmission measures 95%
- Translation of Immunomodulatory Therapy to Treat Chronic Heart Failure: Preclinical Studies to First in Human 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex Differences in Pulmonary Hypertension and Associated Right Ventricular Dysfunction 95%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 94%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.