Back

Stroke Volume Reserve is an Independent Predictor of Survival and Need for Advanced Therapies in Systolic Heart Failure Patients

Selevany, I.; Morris, T.; Vaida, F.; Adler, E. D.; Greenberg, B. H.; Kim, P. J.

2019-12-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2019.12.21.19015610 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCurrent predictors of clinical deterioration in patients with heart-failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have limited accuracy. We investigated whether stroke volume reserve index (SVRI) would predict 1-year mortality and need for advanced therapies in HFrEF patients. MethodsWe retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 104 ambulatory HFrEF patients (59{+/-}11 years, 89% men) at our center who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) from January 2017 to September 2018. The primary outcome was defined as heart-transplantation, urgent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or death within 1 year of evaluation. SVRI was estimated at rest and at anaerobic threshold (AT) by VO2 (oxygen consumption)/pulse and previously validated estimates of C[a-v]O2 (arteriovenous difference in oxygen content). Multivariate regression selected the optimal predictors from clinical, CPET and right heart catheterization data. ResultsAmong HFrEF patients studied, 39 (37.5%) deteriorated: 16 required heart-transplantation, 8 required LVADs and 15 died. SVRI 128% or less was the best predictor (OR 6.69, p=0.001), followed by an invasively determined resting cardiac index 2 L/min/m2 or less (OR 3.18, p=0.02), and peak VO2 below the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) cut-off (OR 4.15, p=0.01). A scoring system derived from the SVRI (less than 128%: 2 points), peak VO2 (below the ISHLT cut-off: 1 point), and cardiac index (less than 2 L/min/m2: 1 point) predicted clinical deterioration with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 81%. ConclusionsSVRI is a non-invasive measurement that may predict deterioration in HFrEF patients more accurately than currently recommended predictors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.