Imputed Genomic Data Reveals a Moderate Effect of Low Frequency Variants to the Heritability of Complex Human Traits
Hartman, K. A.; Rashkin, S. R.; Witte, J. S.; Hernandez, R. D.
Show abstract
The genetic architecture of complex human traits remains largely unknown. The distribution of heritability across the minor allele frequency (MAF) spectrum for a trait will be a function of the MAF of its causal variants and their effect sizes. Assumptions about these relationships underpin the tools used to estimate heritability. We examine the performance of two widely used tools, Haseman-Elston (HE) Regression and genomic-relatedness-based restricted maximum-likelihood (GREML). Our simulations show that HE is less biased than GREML under a wide variety of models and that the estimated standard error for HE tends to be substantially overestimated. We then applied HE Regression to infer the heritability of 72 quantitative biomedical traits from up to 50,000 individuals with genotype and imputation data from the UK Biobank. We found that adding each individuals geolocation as covariates corrected for population stratification that could not be accounted for by principal components alone (particularly for rare variants). The biomedical traits we analyzed had an average heritability of 0.27, with low frequency variants (MAF[≤]0.05) explaining an average of 47.7% of the total heritability (and lower frequency variants with MAF[≤]0.02 explaining a majority of our increased heritability over previous estimates). Variants in regions of low linkage disequilibrium (LD) accounted for 3.3-fold more heritability than the variants in regions of high LD, an effect primarily driven by low frequency variants. These findings suggest a moderate action of negative selection on the causal variants of these traits.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. 95%
- MultiSuSiE improves multi-ancestry fine-mapping in All of Us whole-genome sequencing data 95%
- Leveraging functional genomic annotations and genome coverage to improve polygenic prediction of complex traits within and between ancestries 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- RatXcan: A framework for cross-species integration of genome-wide association and gene expression data 95%
- Integrating Comprehensive Functional Annotations to Boost Power and Accuracy in Gene-Based Association Analysis 95%
- Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populations 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.