Back

The 9aaTAD activation domains in the four Yamanaka Oct4, Sox2, Myc, and Klf4 transcription factors essential during the stem cell development

Piskacek, M.; Jendruchova, K.; Rezacova, M.; Havelka, M.; Gasparik, N.; Hofrova, A.; Knight, A.

2019-12-15 genetics
10.1101/2019.12.15.876706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed by the Yamanaka factors Oct4, Sox2, Myc and Klf4 activators into induced pluripotent stem cells. Throughout their genome, the Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 cooperate with mediators of transcription, where the DNA binding sites serve as scaffolds for the phase-separated transcriptional condensates at distinct genome loci. In this study, we identified the 9aaTAD activation domains as the common interaction interface of the Yamanaka factors for transcription machinery. All four activation domains were identified by our online 9aaTAD prediction service and experimentally confirmed as strong activators of transcription. We considered the mediator interactions granted by 9aaTADs as part of the Yamanaka factors ability to reprogram cell fate. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=64 SRC="FIGDIR/small/876706v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (13K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c5105forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b5e910org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d83c2aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1561881_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Bioscience Reports
● 27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Open Biology
● 106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Genes to Cells
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
○ 233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
BMC Genomic Data
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Human Mutation
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Journal of Biological Chemistry
○ 690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
Immunogenetics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Cells
○ 249 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
○ 638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
27
Molecular Biology Reports
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Gene
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.